El tratamiento de la homonimia y la polisemia en los diccionarios generales de lengua española y su relación con la etimología.

In this paper, we analysed the lexical ambiguity caused by homonymy and polysemy, or the case in which a signifier has more than one signified. The way in which polysemy and homonymy are dealt with in dictionaries relates directly to etymology. On the one hand, when we think about polysemy, meanings...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Revista Futhark no. 16; pp. 79 - 90
Autor principal: Iannotti, Maria
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Revista Futhark 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=157862483&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 157862483
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        18869300
        9356
      jtl: Revista Futhark
      issn: 18869300
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2021
      iid: 16
      pid: 91245
      pub: Revista Futhark
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157862483
        10.12795/futhark.2021.i16.06
      ppf: 79
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.6MB
      tig:
        atl: El tratamiento de la homonimia y la polisemia en los diccionarios generales de lengua española y su relación con la etimología.
      aug:
        au: Iannotti, Maria
        affil: Università Niccolo' Cusano Roma
      su:
        Polysemy
        Etymology
        Orthography & spelling
        Pronunciation
        Lexicography
        Conceptual history
      sug:
        subj:
          Polysemy
          Etymology
          Orthography & spelling
          Pronunciation
          Lexicography
          Conceptual history
      keyword:
        etymology
        homonymy
        lexicography
        polysemy
        pragmatics
        etimología
        homonimia
        lexicografía
        polisemia
        pragmática
      ab:
        In this paper, we analysed the lexical ambiguity caused by homonymy and polysemy, or the case in which a signifier has more than one signified. The way in which polysemy and homonymy are dealt with in dictionaries relates directly to etymology. On the one hand, when we think about polysemy, meanings relate both etymologically and semantically: this means that they share, diachronically speaking, the same history, and a semantic affinity deriving from the linguistic concept of economy (when we speak, we associate meanings similar to the original ones with the same entry). On the other hand, when we think about homonymy, we consider the similarities between two words to be the result of a series of etymologic controversies. That is to say, it is a consequence of a series of phenomena or events, in which the two words acquired either the same spelling or the same pronunciation, despite the specific different referents. In this way, the thing that fundamentally distinguishes the two categories of words is their diachronic aspect, which is connected to the etymologic evolution and the history of a language. In short, what distinguishes homonymy from polysemy is etymology.
        En el presente trabajo analizamos la ambigüedad léxica producida por la homonimia y la polisemia, es decir, la situación en que a un significante le corresponde más de un significado. El tratamiento de la homonimia y la polisemia en los diccionarios está directamente relacionado con la materia etimológica. En la polisemia, los significados están relacionados, tanto etimológica como semánticamente: eso significa que tienen una historia común y una afinidad semántica que depende del criterio lingüístico de la economía (cuando hablamos asociamos al mismo lema significados similares a los originarios). En la homonimia, al contrario, la igualdad entre dos palabras se debe a una serie de controversias etimológicas, es decir, a causa de una serie de fenómenos y acontecimientos, los dos términos han asumido la misma grafía o el mismo sonido, a pesar de seguir indicando referentes distintos. De esta manera, el eje fundamental que distingue las dos categorías de palabras se convierte en el aspecto diacrónico que está relacionado con la evolución etimológica y la historia de la lengua. En resumen, lo que distingue la homonimia de la polisemia es la etimología.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Spanish
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Revista Futhark is the property of Revista Futhark and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Revista Futhark
      holder: Revista Futhark
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N