Quantum correlations and the explanatory power of radical metaphysical hypotheses.

I argue that, in at least one important sense, the hypothesis that you are a brain in a vat provides better explanations than the explanations provided by standard ways of interpreting our best scientific theories. This puts pressure on anyone who—like me!—wishes to resist taking this radical hypoth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Studies Vol. 179; no. 7; pp. 2391 - 2415
Autor principal: Emery, Nina
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jul2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=157888480&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 157888480
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318116
        4L8
      jtl: Philosophical Studies
      issn: 00318116
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2022
      vid: 179
      iid: 7
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157888480
        10.1007/s11098-021-01769-z
      ppf: 2391
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 334KB
      tig:
        atl: Quantum correlations and the explanatory power of radical metaphysical hypotheses.
      aug:
        au: Emery, Nina
        affil: Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, USA
      su:
        Quantum correlations
        Metaphysics
        Philosophy
        Boltzmann factor
        Optical quantum computing
      sug:
        subj:
          Quantum correlations
          Metaphysics
          Philosophy
          Boltzmann factor
          Optical quantum computing
      keyword:
        Inference to the best explanation
        The brain in a vat
      ab: I argue that, in at least one important sense, the hypothesis that you are a brain in a vat provides better explanations than the explanations provided by standard ways of interpreting our best scientific theories. This puts pressure on anyone who—like me!—wishes to resist taking this radical hypothesis seriously when doing science and scientifically-informed metaphysics. Insofar as our resistance is justified, it can't be justified simply by claiming that the brain in a vast hypothesis is explanatorily impoverished.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophical Studies is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophical Studies
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N