Risk perception, illusory superiority and personal responsibility during COVID‐19: An experimental study of attitudes to staying home.

Little is known about how different government communication strategies may systematically affect people's attitudes to staying home or going out during the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor how people perceive and process the risk of viral transmission in different scenarios. In this study, we report results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Psychology Vol. 113; no. 3; pp. 608 - 630
Autores principales: van Baal, Simon T., Walasek, Lukasz, Karanfilovska, Daniela, Cheng, Allen C., Hohwy, Jakob
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=157935084&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 157935084
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00071269
        BJP
      jtl: British Journal of Psychology
      issn: 00071269
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2022
      vid: 113
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157935084
        10.1111/bjop.12554
      ppf: 608
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 3.4MB
      tig:
        atl: Risk perception, illusory superiority and personal responsibility during COVID‐19: An experimental study of attitudes to staying home.
      aug:
        au:
          van Baal, Simon T.
          Walasek, Lukasz
          Karanfilovska, Daniela
          Cheng, Allen C.
          Hohwy, Jakob
        affil:
          Cognition & Philosophy Lab, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Melbourne Victoria,, Australia
          Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK
          Infection Prevention and Healthcare Epidemiology Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne Victoria,, Australia
          School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne Victoria,, Australia
      su:
        Attitude (Psychology)
        Age distribution
        Responsibility
        Infectious disease transmission
        Communication
        COVID-19 pandemic
        Public opinion
        Experimental design
        Risk perception
        Stay-at-home orders
        Social distancing
      sug:
        subj:
          Attitude (Psychology)
          Age distribution
          Responsibility
          Infectious disease transmission
          Communication
          COVID-19 pandemic
          Public opinion
          Experimental design
          Risk perception
          Stay-at-home orders
          Social distancing
      keyword:
        COVID‐19
        illusory superiority
        imperatives
        personal responsibility
        risk perception
        social distancing
        COVID‐19
        illusory superiority
        imperatives
        personal responsibility
        risk perception
        social distancing
      ab: Little is known about how different government communication strategies may systematically affect people's attitudes to staying home or going out during the COVID‐19 pandemic, nor how people perceive and process the risk of viral transmission in different scenarios. In this study, we report results from two experiments that examine the degree to which people's attitudes regarding the permissibility of leaving one's home are (1) sensitive to different levels of risk of viral transmission in specific scenarios, (2) sensitive to communication framings that are either imperative or that emphasize personal responsibility, or (3) creating 'loopholes' for themselves, enabling a more permissive approach to their own compliance. We find that the level of risk influences attitudes to going out, and that participants report less permissive attitudes to going out when prompted with messages framed in imperative terms, rather than messages emphasizing personal responsibility; for self‐loopholes, we find no evidence that participants' attitudes towards going out in specific scenarios are more permissive for themselves than for others. However, participants report they are more rigorous in staying home than others, which may cause moral licensing. Additionally, we find that age is negatively associated with permissive attitudes, and that male participants are more permissive to going out. Thus, during phases where it is important to promote staying home for all scenarios, including those perceived to be low‐risk, imperative communication may be best suited to increase compliance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N