Impact of Taking Family Leaves Across Finnish Fathers' Wage Distribution.

Evidence is mixed as to whether less- or more-advantaged fathers suffer penalties for taking paid family leave and the reasons for this. Perhaps selection into taking leave differs among fathers, or taking leave increases some fathers' commitment to family over paid work, or taking it sends a negati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Forces Vol. 101; no. 1; pp. 202 - 227
Autores principales: Morosow, Kathrin, Cooke, Lynn Prince
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Sep2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=158077224&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 158077224
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00377732
        SFR
      jtl: Social Forces
      issn: 00377732
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2022
      vid: 101
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158077224
        10.1093/sf/soab106
      ppf: 202
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1.5MB
      tig:
        atl: Impact of Taking Family Leaves Across Finnish Fathers' Wage Distribution.
      aug:
        au:
          Morosow, Kathrin
          Cooke, Lynn Prince
        affil: Department of Social and Policy Sciences , University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
      su:
        Finland
        Paternity leave
        Wages
        Family leave
        Working fathers
        Family-work relationship
      sug:
        subj:
          Paternity leave
          Wages
          Family leave
          Working fathers
          Family-work relationship
          Finland
      ab: Evidence is mixed as to whether less- or more-advantaged fathers suffer penalties for taking paid family leave and the reasons for this. Perhaps selection into taking leave differs among fathers, or taking leave increases some fathers' commitment to family over paid work, or taking it sends a negative signal to employers about future work-family priorities. We contribute to the literature by distinguishing between the initial paternity leave taken by the majority of fathers, and subsequent solo paternal leave taken by fewer fathers that indicates and signals greater family commitment. We also develop competing hypotheses about why low- or high-wage fathers may be penalized more for taking family leave. These are tested analyzing 2001 to 2014 waves of Finnish administrative panel data using unconditional quantile regression with various fixed-effects models. Net of selection, no fathers incur a sustained wage penalty for taking paternity leave, although distributed fixed-effects models reveal the highest-wage fathers receive a temporary penalty that we attribute to signaling. All fathers who also take solo paternal leave have decreasing post-leave wage trajectories. Only lower-wage fathers accrue significant penalties, however, suggesting that taking the leave shifts their priorities more toward family. We conclude the repercussions of taking shorter or longer family leaves and their sources differ across fathers' wage distribution.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N