Evidence and Knowledge from Computer Simulation.
Can computer simulation results be evidence for hypotheses about real-world systems and phenomena? If so, what sort of evidence? Can we gain genuinely new knowledge of the world via simulation? I argue that evidence from computer simulation is aptly characterized as higher-order evidence: it is evid...
| Published in: | Erkenntnis Vol. 87; no. 4; pp. 1521 - 1539 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Aug2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| Summary: | Can computer simulation results be evidence for hypotheses about real-world systems and phenomena? If so, what sort of evidence? Can we gain genuinely new knowledge of the world via simulation? I argue that evidence from computer simulation is aptly characterized as higher-order evidence: it is evidence that other evidence regarding a hypothesis about the world has been collected. Insofar as particular epistemic agents do not have this other evidence, it is possible that they will gain genuinely new knowledge of the world via simulation. I illustrate with examples inspired by uses of simulation in meteorology and astrophysics. |
|---|