Trolleys, Transplants and Inequality: An Egalitarian Proposal.

This paper deals with the core version of the Trolley Problem. In one case (Trolley) many people favor an act (throwing a switch) which will bring about the death of one person but save five other persons (rather than letting five die and one go on living). In another case (Transplant) most people w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Erkenntnis Vol. 87; no. 4; pp. 1737 - 1752
Autor principal: Baumann, Peter
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=158079795&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 158079795
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650106
        5KZ
      jtl: Erkenntnis
      issn: 01650106
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2022
      vid: 87
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158079795
        10.1007/s10670-020-00271-y
      ppf: 1737
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 550KB
      tig:
        atl: Trolleys, Transplants and Inequality: An Egalitarian Proposal.
      aug:
        au: Baumann, Peter
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, 19081, Swarthmore, PA, USA
      su:
        Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc.
        Equality
        Verdicts
        Explanation
      sug:
        subj:
          Transplantation of organs, tissues, etc.
          Equality
          Verdicts
          Explanation
      ab: This paper deals with the core version of the Trolley Problem. In one case (Trolley) many people favor an act (throwing a switch) which will bring about the death of one person but save five other persons (rather than letting five die and one go on living). In another case (Transplant) most people would refuse to "sacrifice" one person in order to save five other lives (rather than letting five die and one go on living). Since the two cases seem similar in all relevant respects, we have to explain and justify the diverging verdicts. Since I don't find current proposals of a solution convincing, I propose an alternative one according to which (Transplant)—but not (Trolley)—violates two forms of equality. I also test the underlying egalitarian principle against other cases. I argue that it offers a good explanation and also a normative justification of our intuitive verdicts about the cases.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Erkenntnis
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N