Combined artificial intelligence and radiologist model for predicting rectal cancer treatment response from magnetic resonance imaging: an external validation study.

Purpose: To evaluate an MRI-based radiomic texture classifier alone and combined with radiologist qualitative assessment in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) using restaging MRI with internal training and external validation. Methods: Consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 47; no. 8; pp. 2770 - 2783
Autores principales: Horvat, Natally, Veeraraghavan, Harini, Nahas, Caio S. R., Bates, ‬David D. B., Ferreira, Felipe R., Zheng, Junting, Capanu, Marinela, Fuqua III, James L., Fernandes, Maria Clara, Sosa, Ramon E., Jayaprakasam, Vetri Sudar, Cerri, Giovanni G., Nahas, Sergio C., Petkovska, Iva
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=158081232&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 158081232
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2366004X
        JT14
      jtl: Abdominal Radiology
      issn: 2366004X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2022
      vid: 47
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158081232
        157477046
        10.1007/s00261-022-03572-8
        158081232
      ppf: 2770
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Combined artificial intelligence and radiologist model for predicting rectal cancer treatment response from magnetic resonance imaging: an external validation study.
      aug:
        au:
          Horvat, Natally
          Veeraraghavan, Harini
          Nahas, Caio S. R.
          Bates, ‬David D. B.
          Ferreira, Felipe R.
          Zheng, Junting
          Capanu, Marinela
          Fuqua III, James L.
          Fernandes, Maria Clara
          Sosa, Ramon E.
          Jayaprakasam, Vetri Sudar
          Cerri, Giovanni G.
          Nahas, Sergio C.
          Petkovska, Iva
        affil: Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 29, 10065, New York, NY, USA
      sug:
      ab: Purpose: To evaluate an MRI-based radiomic texture classifier alone and combined with radiologist qualitative assessment in predicting pathological complete response (pCR) using restaging MRI with internal training and external validation. Methods: Consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by total mesorectal excision from March 2012 to February 2016 (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center/internal dataset, n = 114, 41% female, median age = 55) and July 2014 to October 2015 (Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo/external dataset, n = 50, 52% female, median age = 64.5) were retrospectively included. Two radiologists (R1, senior; R2, junior) independently evaluated restaging MRI, classifying patients (radiological complete response vs radiological partial response). Model A (n = 33 texture features), model B (n = 91 features including texture, shape, and edge features), and two combination models (model A + B + R1, model A + B + R2) were constructed. Pathology served as the reference standard for neoadjuvant treatment response. Comparison of the classifiers' AUCs on the external set was done using DeLong's test. Results: Models A and B had similar discriminative ability (P = 0.3; Model B AUC = 83%, 95% CI 70%–97%). Combined models increased inter-reader agreement compared with radiologist-only interpretation (κ = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.89 vs k = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11–0.61). The combined model slightly increased junior radiologist specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values (93% vs 90%, 57% vs 50%, and 91% vs 90%, respectively). Conclusion: We developed and externally validated a combined model using radiomics and radiologist qualitative assessment, which improved inter-reader agreement and slightly increased the diagnostic performance of the junior radiologist in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with LARC.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N