Satisfaction or connectivity?: Implications from the strong relationality model of flourishing couple relationships.
A central feature of couple relationships research is the use of self‐report measures of relationship satisfaction. Despite the widespread use of such measures in couples' research, scholars have raised critical questions about satisfaction‐focused assessment, including concerns about taking an onto...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Marital & Family Therapy Vol. 48; no. 3; pp. 883 - 908 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=158082665&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 158082665 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0194472X JMF jtl: Journal of Marital & Family Therapy issn: 0194472X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2022 vid: 48 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 158082665 10.1111/jmft.12559 ppf: 883 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 450KB tig: atl: Satisfaction or connectivity?: Implications from the strong relationality model of flourishing couple relationships. aug: au: Galovan, Adam M. Carroll, Jason S. Schramm, David G. Leonhardt, Nathan D. Zuluaga, Johana McKenadel, Siobahn E. M. Oleksuik, McKenna R. affil: Department of Human Ecology, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta,, Canada School of Family Life, Brigham Young University, Provo Utah,, USA Human Development and Family Studies, Utah State University, Logan Utah,, USA Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario,, Canada su: Canada Couples Relationship quality Positive psychology sug: subj: Couples Relationship quality Positive psychology Canada keyword: positive psychology relationship flourishing relationship quality relationship satisfaction responsible actions virtues positive psychology relationship flourishing relationship quality relationship satisfaction responsible actions virtues ab: A central feature of couple relationships research is the use of self‐report measures of relationship satisfaction. Despite the widespread use of such measures in couples' research, scholars have raised critical questions about satisfaction‐focused assessment, including concerns about taking an ontologically individualistic focus. Moving beyond ontological individualism, drawing from the Strong Relationality Model of Relationship Flourishing and data from 615 couples in the United States and Canada (N = 1230 individuals), we explored similarities and differences between assessments of relationship satisfaction and a measure based on strong relationality (relational‐connectivity). We evaluated associations with other scales assessing relationship factors including indicators of well‐being, relationship processes, virtues, and responsible actions. Using confirmatory latent profile analysis, we classified individuals as Flourishing (55.4%), Languishing (31.8%), Connected, Less‐Satisfied (7.8%), or Satisfied, Less‐Connected (5.0%). Our results suggest that attending to richer perspectives of relationship quality may spur additional understanding of many factors associated with meaningful couple relationships. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|