3D printing for orbital volume anatomical measurement.
Purpose: The aim was to develop a method for reproducible orbital volume (OV) measurement in vivo based on 3D printing. Methods: Twelve orbits were obtained from dry skulls of the Human Anatomy Department of Lille University. Computer tomography (CT) slice images of these orbits were transformed int...
| Publicado en: | Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy Vol. 44; no. 7; pp. 991 - 999 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jul2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=158136405&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 158136405 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09301038 O1L jtl: Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy issn: 09301038 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2022 vid: 44 iid: 7 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 158136405 157743691 10.1007/s00276-022-02968-x 158136405 ppf: 991 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: 3D printing for orbital volume anatomical measurement. aug: au: Piot, Nolwenn Barry, Florent Schlund, Matthias Ferri, Joël Demondion, Xavier Nicot, Romain affil: Service de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et Stomatologie, Hôpital Roger Salengro – CHU Lille, Rue Emile Laine, 59037, Lille Cedex, France sug: ab: Purpose: The aim was to develop a method for reproducible orbital volume (OV) measurement in vivo based on 3D printing. Methods: Twelve orbits were obtained from dry skulls of the Human Anatomy Department of Lille University. Computer tomography (CT) slice images of these orbits were transformed into stereo-lithography (STL) format and 3D-printed. Bone openings were closed using either putty and cellophane after printing (3D-Orb-1) or at the printing stage in silico using MeshMixer (3D-Orb-2). The results were compared with those of the conventional water-filling method as a control group (Anat-Orb). Results: The observers reported a mean orbital volume of 21.3 ± 2.1 cm3 for the open-skull method, 21.2 ± 2.4 cm3 for the non-sealed 3D-printing method, and 22.2 ± 2.0 cm3 for the closed-print method. Furthermore, the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) showed excellent intra-rater agreement, i.e., an ICC of 0.994 for the first observer and 0.998 for the second, and excellent interobserver agreement (ICC: 0.969). The control and 3D-Orb-1 groups show excellent agreement (ICC: 0.972). The 3D-Orb-2 exhibits moderate agreement (ICC: 0.855) with the control and appears to overestimate orbital volume slightly. Conclusion: Our 3D-printing method provides a standardized and reproducible method for the measurement of orbital volume. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|