Two Means Together? Effects of Response Bias and Sensitivity on Communicative Action Detection.

Numerous lines of research suggest that communicative dyadic actions elicit preferential processing and more accurate detection compared to similar but individual actions. However, it is unclear whether the presence of the second agent provides additional cues that allow for more accurate discrimina...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Vol. 46; no. 3; pp. 281 - 299
Autores principales: Piejka, Aleksandra, Piaskowska, Liwia, Okruszek, Łukasz
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=158312858&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 158312858
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01915886
        JNV
      jtl: Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
      issn: 01915886
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2022
      vid: 46
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158312858
        10.1007/s10919-022-00398-2
      ppf: 281
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 772KB
      tig:
        atl: Two Means Together? Effects of Response Bias and Sensitivity on Communicative Action Detection.
      aug:
        au:
          Piejka, Aleksandra
          Piaskowska, Liwia
          Okruszek, Łukasz
        affil:
          Social Neuroscience Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Jaracza 1, 00-378, Warsaw, Poland
          Department of Neuropsychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
      su:
        Nonverbal communication
        Task performance
        Comparative studies
        Conceptual structures
        Visual perception
        Intention
        Prompts (Psychology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Nonverbal communication
          Task performance
          Comparative studies
          Conceptual structures
          Visual perception
          Intention
          Prompts (Psychology)
      keyword:
        Communicative actions
        Communicative intentions
        Point-light
        Response bias
        Signal detection theory
        Communicative actions
        Communicative intentions
        Point-light
        Response bias
        Signal detection theory
      ab: Numerous lines of research suggest that communicative dyadic actions elicit preferential processing and more accurate detection compared to similar but individual actions. However, it is unclear whether the presence of the second agent provides additional cues that allow for more accurate discriminability between communicative and individual intentions or whether it lowers the threshold for perceiving third-party encounters as interactive. We performed a series of studies comparing the recognition of communicative actions from single and dyadic displays in healthy individuals. A decreased response threshold for communicative actions was observed for dyadic vs. single-agent animations across all three studies, providing evidence for the dyadic communicative bias. Furthermore, consistent with the facilitated recognition hypothesis, congruent response to a communicative gesture increased the ability to accurately interpret the actions. In line with dual-process theory, we propose that both mechanisms may be perceived as complementary rather than competitive and affect different stages of stimuli processing.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N