What Makes Personal Data Processing by Social Networking Services Permissible?
Social networking services provide services in return for rights to commercialize users' personal data. We argue that what makes this transaction permissible is not users' autonomous consent but the provision of sufficiently valuable opportunities to exchange data for services. We argue that the val...
| Publicado en: | Canadian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 52; no. 1; pp. 93 - 109 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Jan2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=158405216&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 158405216 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00455091 CJP jtl: Canadian Journal of Philosophy issn: 00455091 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2022 vid: 52 iid: 1 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 158405216 10.1017/can.2022.4 ppf: 93 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: What Makes Personal Data Processing by Social Networking Services Permissible? aug: au: Wolmarans, Lichelle Voorhoeve, Alex affil: PUBLIC, London, UK Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London, UK su: Social networks Social media Electronic data processing Social processes Personally identifiable information sug: subj: Social networks Social media Electronic data processing Social processes Personally identifiable information keyword: autonomy Consent contractualism personal data processing privacy ab: Social networking services provide services in return for rights to commercialize users' personal data. We argue that what makes this transaction permissible is not users' autonomous consent but the provision of sufficiently valuable opportunities to exchange data for services. We argue that the value of these opportunities should be assessed for both (a) a range of users with different decision-making abilities and (b) third parties. We conclude that regulation should shift from aiming to ensure autonomous consent towards ensuring that users face options that they will use to advance individual and common interests. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|