Measuring Sexual Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review of the Sexual Delay Discounting Task.

The Sexual Delay Discounting Task (SDDT; Johnson & Bruner, 2012) is a behavioral economic task that assesses sexual risk-taking by measuring likelihood of immediate and delayed condom use. The SDDT is ecologically valid and has been used to test effects of various substances on sexual risk-taking. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Archives of Sexual Behavior Vol. 51; no. 6; pp. 2899 - 2921
Autores principales: Gebru, Nioud Mulugeta, Kalkat, Meher, Strickland, Justin C., Ansell, Margaret, Leeman, Robert F., Berry, Meredith S.
Formato: journal article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=158431561&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 158431561
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00040002
        ASX
      jtl: Archives of Sexual Behavior
      issn: 00040002
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2022
      vid: 51
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158431561
        10.1007/s10508-022-02355-y
      ppf: 2899
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 730KB
      tig:
        atl: Measuring Sexual Risk-Taking: A Systematic Review of the Sexual Delay Discounting Task.
      aug:
        au:
          Gebru, Nioud Mulugeta
          Kalkat, Meher
          Strickland, Justin C.
          Ansell, Margaret
          Leeman, Robert F.
          Berry, Meredith S.
        affil:
          Department of Health Education and Behavior, Center for Behavioral Economic Health Research
          Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
          Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
          Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
          Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
      su:
        Risk-taking behavior
        Human sexuality
        Homosexuality
        Cocaine
        Condoms
        Research evaluation
        Delay discounting (Psychology)
        Systematic reviews
        Research funding
      sug:
        subj:
          Risk-taking behavior
          Human sexuality
          Homosexuality
          Cocaine
          Condoms
          Pharmaceutical and medicine manufacturing
          Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing
          Other rubber product manufacturing
          All Other Rubber Product Manufacturing
          Research evaluation
          Delay discounting (Psychology)
          Systematic reviews
          Research funding
      keyword:
        Behavioral economics
        Condom use
        Delay discounting
        HIV
        Impulsivity
        Sexual risk-taking
        Behavioral economics
        Condom use
        Delay discounting
        HIV
        Impulsivity
        Sexual risk-taking
      ab: The Sexual Delay Discounting Task (SDDT; Johnson & Bruner, 2012) is a behavioral economic task that assesses sexual risk-taking by measuring likelihood of immediate and delayed condom use. The SDDT is ecologically valid and has been used to test effects of various substances on sexual risk-taking. However, considerable variety in implementation, analysis, and reporting of the SDDT may limit rigor and reproducibility of findings. The current review synthesized studies that used the SDDT to evaluate these possible variabilities systematically. A two-step search (citation-tracking and keyword-based search) was conducted to identify studies that met inclusion criteria (i.e., used the SDDT). Eighteen peer-reviewed articles met inclusion criteria. The SDDT has been implemented primarily in three populations: individuals who use cocaine, men who have sex with men, and college students. Comparable results across diverse populations support the SDDT's validity. A few studies administered substances before the SDDT. Evidence suggests that while cocaine and alcohol increased sexual risk-taking under some conditions, buspirone decreased preference for immediate condomless sex. There was also heterogeneity in the determination of data orderliness (i.e., outliers) and inconsistent reporting of task design and analysis. Considerable differences present in methodologic approaches could influence results. Reducing variation in the administration, analysis, and reporting of the SDDT will enhance rigor and reproducibility and maximize the task's tremendous potential.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: journal article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N