The Anthropocene as a historical hyperobject.

The notion of the Anthropocene has gained momentum in many academic disciplines in the last couple of decades. Yet it seems that history, both as a human science and a political frame, fails to come to terms with this new geological epoch in which the distinction between humanity and nature blurs. E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Rethinking History Vol. 26; no. 3; pp. 371 - 392
Autor principal: Rueda, Daniel
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Sep2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=158632893&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 158632893
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13642529
        5C5
      jtl: Rethinking History
      issn: 13642529
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2022
      vid: 26
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158632893
        10.1080/13642529.2022.2104967
      ppf: 371
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 342KB
      tig:
        atl: The Anthropocene as a historical hyperobject.
      aug:
        au: Rueda, Daniel
        affil: Department of European & International Studies, King's College London, London, UK
      su:
        Anthropocene Epoch
        College curriculum
        Humanity
        Anthroposophy
        Historiography
      sug:
        subj:
          Anthropocene Epoch
          College curriculum
          Humanity
          Anthroposophy
          Historiography
      keyword:
        Anthropocene
        anthropocenism
        anthropocentrism
        epistemology
        historiography
        Hyperobject
        posthumanism
      ab: The notion of the Anthropocene has gained momentum in many academic disciplines in the last couple of decades. Yet it seems that history, both as a human science and a political frame, fails to come to terms with this new geological epoch in which the distinction between humanity and nature blurs. Employing the concept of 'hyperobject', this article argues that such collision is not an accident or the result of historiography lagging behind. Rather, it is linked to both epistemological limits (related to time-scale, documentary and field autonomy issues) and political questions (related to human agency and universality). In conclusion, potential alternatives to posthuman anthropocenism are considered as a way to both maintain the foundations of the discipline and build post-anthropocentric approaches.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Rethinking History is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Rethinking History
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N