Structure and applied mathematics.

‘Mapping accounts’ of applied mathematics hold that the application of mathematics in physical science is best understood in terms of ‘mappings’ between mathematical structures and physical structures. In this paper, I suggest that mapping accounts rely on the assumption that the mathematics relevan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Synthese Vol. 200; no. 5; pp. 1 - 26
Autor principal: McKenna, Travis
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Oct2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=158872154&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 158872154
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00397857
        4LI
      jtl: Synthese
      issn: 00397857
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2022
      vid: 200
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        158872154
        10.1007/s11229-022-03873-x
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 25
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 877KB
      tig:
        atl: Structure and applied mathematics.
      aug:
        au: McKenna, Travis
        affil: University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Avenue, 15260, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
      sug:
      keyword:
        Inferential conception of applied mathematics
        Mapping accounts
        Philosophy of applied mathematics
        Philosophy of mathematics
        Philosophy of science
      ab: ‘Mapping accounts’ of applied mathematics hold that the application of mathematics in physical science is best understood in terms of ‘mappings’ between mathematical structures and physical structures. In this paper, I suggest that mapping accounts rely on the assumption that the mathematics relevant to any application of mathematics in empirical science can be captured in an appropriate mathematical structure. If we are interested in assessing the plausibility of mapping accounts, we must ask ourselves: how plausible is this assumption as a working hypothesis about applied mathematics? In order to do so, we examine the role played by mathematics in the multiscalar modelling of sea ice melting behaviour and examine whether we can indeed capture the mathematics involved in the kind of mathematical structure employed by the mapping account. Along the way, we note that the cases of applied mathematics that appear in discussions of mapping accounts almost exclusively involve the employment of a single clearly circumscribed mathematical field or domain (e.g. ‘the use of arithmetic in counting physical objects’). While the core assumption of mapping accounts may appear plausible in such situations, we ultimately suggest that the mapping account is not able to handle the important added complexities involved in our sea ice case study. In particular, the notion of mathematical structure around which such accounts are framed does not seem to be able to capture the way in which some applications of mathematics require that very different pieces of mathematics be related to one another on the basis of both mathematical and empirical information.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Synthese is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Synthese
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N