Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer: Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer.
Objective: To review existing structured MRI reports for primary staging of rectal cancer and create a new, freely available structured report based on multidisciplinary expert opinion and literature review. Methods: Twenty abdominal imaging experts from the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)'s Di...
| Publicado en: | Abdominal Radiology Vol. 47; no. 10; pp. 3364 - 3375 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Oct2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159001527&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 159001527 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 2366004X JT14 jtl: Abdominal Radiology issn: 2366004X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 47 iid: 10 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 159001527 158180198 10.1007/s00261-022-03612-3 159001527 ppf: 3364 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Update to the structured MRI report for primary staging of rectal cancer: Perspective from the SAR Disease Focused Panel on Rectal and Anal Cancer. aug: au: Kassam, Zahra Lang, Rebecca Arya, Supreeta Bates, David D. B. Chang, Kevin J. Fraum, Tyler J. Friedman, Kenneth A. Golia Pernicka, Jennifer S. Gollub, Marc J. Harisinghani, Mukesh Khatri, Gaurav Korngold, Elena Lall, Chandana Lee, Sonia Magnetta, Michael Moreno, Courtney Nougaret, Stephanie Paroder, Viktoriya Paspulati, Raj M. Petkovska, Iva affil: Western University, London, ON, Canada sug: ab: Objective: To review existing structured MRI reports for primary staging of rectal cancer and create a new, freely available structured report based on multidisciplinary expert opinion and literature review. Methods: Twenty abdominal imaging experts from the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)'s Disease Focused Panel (DFP) on Rectal and Anal Cancer completed a questionnaire and participated in a subsequent consensus meeting based on the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. Twenty-two items were classified via a group survey as "appropriate" or "inappropriate" (defined by ≥ 70% consensus), or "needs group discussion" (defined by < 70% consensus). Certain items were also discussed with multidisciplinary team members from colorectal surgery, oncology and pathology. Results: After completion of the questionnaire, 16 (72%) items required further discussion (< 70% consensus). Following group discussion, consensus was achieved for 21 (95%) of the items. Based on the consensus meeting, a revised structured report was developed. The most significant modifications included (1) Exclusion of the T2/early T3 category; (2) Replacement of the term "circumferential resection margin (CRM)" with "mesorectal fascia (MRF)"; (3) A revised definition of "mucinous content"; (4) Creation of two distinct categories for suspicious lymph nodes (LNs) and tumor deposits; and (5) Classification of suspicious extra-mesorectal LNs by anatomic location. Conclusion: The SAR DFP on Rectal and Anal Cancer recommends using this newly updated reporting template for primary MRI staging of rectal cancer. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|