The Paradox of Anthroponormative Restriction: Artistic Artificial Intelligence and Literary Writing.

Artificial Intelligence, in the shape of stochastic machine learning models, has seen an increased use in artistic production in recent years. However, it makes an immense difference if such an 'artistic Artificial Intelligence' is conceived of as an autonomous agent or only as a tool in the context...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:CounterText Vol. 8; no. 2; pp. 262 - 283
Autor principal: Bajohr, Hannes
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Edinburgh University Press Aug2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=159139645&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 159139645
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        20564406
        JRXS
      jtl: CounterText
      issn: 20564406
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2022
      vid: 8
      iid: 2
      pid: 2327
      pub: Edinburgh University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        159139645
        10.3366/count.2022.0270
      ppf: 262
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 810KB
      tig:
        atl: The Paradox of Anthroponormative Restriction: Artistic Artificial Intelligence and Literary Writing.
      aug:
        au: Bajohr, Hannes
      su:
        Artificial intelligence
        Stochastic learning models
        Paradox
        Aesthetics
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial intelligence
          Stochastic learning models
          Paradox
          Aesthetics
      keyword:
        anthropocentrism
        Artificial Intelligence
        computational creativity
        electronic literature
        experimental literature
        language models
      ab: Artificial Intelligence, in the shape of stochastic machine learning models, has seen an increased use in artistic production in recent years. However, it makes an immense difference if such an 'artistic Artificial Intelligence' is conceived of as an autonomous agent or only as a tool in the context of a human-machine assemblage. This article introduces the distinction between a 'strong' and a 'weak' artistic AI, and suggests that each invites a specific aesthetic. The former is inherently anthropocentric, strives for the reduplication of existing artforms, and reproduces concepts of a postromantic tradition such as expression, genius, and creativity. The latter, on the other hand, allows for an experimental approach towards genuine artistic novelty unhampered by human models through, paradoxically, keeping a human in the loop. This point is illustrated by discussing Ahmed Elgammal's 'Creative Adversarial Network' and the digital poetry of Allison Parrish and Zach Whalen.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of CounterText is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: CounterText
      holder: Edinburgh University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N