Varying retrieval conditions to study survival processing.
The survival processing advantage is a mnemonic benefit resulting from processing items for their relevance to survival. One explanation of the survival processing advantage is the richness-of-encoding hypothesis: Survival processing enhances retention by generating ideas (elaborative and distinctiv...
| Publicado en: | Memory Vol. 30; no. 9; pp. 1087 - 1103 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159297467&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 159297467 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09658211 BAY jtl: Memory issn: 09658211 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 30 iid: 9 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 159297467 157094679 159297467 159297467 10.1080/09658211.2022.2080226 159297467 ppf: 1087 ppct: 16 formats: tig: atl: Varying retrieval conditions to study survival processing. aug: au: Alban, Michael W. Annibal, Sarah C. affil: Department of Psychological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA sug: subj: Semantic Memory Mental Processes Task Performance and Analysis Executive Function Cues Human Male Female Adolescence Adult Analysis of Variance Repeated Measures Descriptive Statistics Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: The survival processing advantage is a mnemonic benefit resulting from processing items for their relevance to survival. One explanation of the survival processing advantage is the richness-of-encoding hypothesis: Survival processing enhances retention by generating ideas (elaborative and distinctive processing), increasing the number of retrieval cues. Without retrieval, encoding is futile. Hence, the present experiments varied retrieval conditions – via transfer appropriate processing (TAP) tasks – predicting that the survival processing advantage could be reversed. In Experiment 1a, reducing the transfer appropriateness of survival processing caused significantly lower recognition scores after survival processing than after processing of word associates. Experiment 1b replicated a survival processing advantage and found a survival processing disadvantage. In Experiment 2, survival processing was pitted against a gift desirability task and retrieval mode was varied. Survival processing yielded superior memory on a standard free recall test, but the survival processing advantage was eliminated when an unusual retrieval mode was encouraged. Results affirm the importance of context-dependent retrieval. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|