Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.
Modality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger cost...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 50; no. 7; pp. 1546 - 1563 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Oct2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=159303712&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 159303712 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 50 iid: 7 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 159303712 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4 ppf: 1546 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching. aug: au: Friedgen, Erik Koch, Iring Stephan, Denise Nadine affil: Institute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Jägerstr. 17/19, D-52066, Aachen, Germany su: Task performance Speech Experimental design Auditory perception Brain mapping Sensory stimulation Neuropsychological tests Visual perception Probability theory sug: subj: Task performance Speech Experimental design Auditory perception Brain mapping Sensory stimulation Neuropsychological tests Visual perception Probability theory keyword: Modality compatibility S-R compatibility Task switching Modality compatibility S-R compatibility Task switching ab: Modality compatibility (MC) describes the similarity between the modality of the stimulus and the modality of the anticipated response effect (e.g., auditory effects when speaking). Switching between two incompatible modality mappings (visual-vocal and auditory-manual) typically leads to larger costs than switching between two compatible modality mappings (visual-manual and auditory-vocal). However, it is unclear whether the influence of MC arises before or after task selection or response selection, or affects both processes. We investigated this issue by introducing a factor known to influence response selection, stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility, examining possible interactions with MC. In Experiment 1, stimulus location was task-irrelevant; participants responded manually or vocally to the meaning of visual and auditory colour words presented left or right (Simon task). In Experiment 2, stimulus location was task-relevant; participants responded manually or vocally, indicating the location (left or right) of visual or auditory stimuli, using a spatially compatible versus incompatible mapping rule ("element-level" S-R compatibility). Results revealed independent effects of S-R and modality compatibility in both experiments (n = 40 per experiment). Bayes factors suggested moderate but consistent evidence for the absence of an interaction. Independent effects suggest MC effects arise either before or after response selection, or possibly both. We propose that motor response initiation is associated with anticipatory activation of modality-specific sensory effects (e.g., auditory effects when speaking), which in turn facilitates the correct response in case of modality-compatible mappings (e.g., auditory-vocal) or reactivates, at the task-selection level, the incorrect task in case of modality-incompatible mappings (e.g., visual-vocal). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|