Memory, Knowledge, and Epistemic Luck.

Does 'remembering that p ' entail 'knowing that p '? The widely-accepted epistemic theory of memory (hereafter, ETM) answers affirmatively. This paper purports to reveal the tension between ETM and the prevailing anti-luck epistemology. Central to my argument is the fact that we often 'vaguely remem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 72; no. 4; pp. 896 - 918
Autor principal: Lai, Changsheng
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Oct2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=159312063&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 159312063
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318094
        PHQ
      jtl: Philosophical Quarterly
      issn: 00318094
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2022
      vid: 72
      iid: 4
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        159312063
        10.1093/pq/pqab064
      ppf: 896
      ppct: 22
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 228KB
      tig:
        atl: Memory, Knowledge, and Epistemic Luck.
      aug:
        au: Lai, Changsheng
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University , China
      su:
        Memory
        Theory of knowledge
        Epistemics
        Philosophy
        Psychology
      sug:
        subj:
          Memory
          Theory of knowledge
          Epistemics
          Philosophy
          Psychology
      keyword:
        anti-luck epistemology
        misremembering
        simulationism
        the epistemic theory of memory
        vaguely remember
      ab: Does 'remembering that p ' entail 'knowing that p '? The widely-accepted epistemic theory of memory (hereafter, ETM) answers affirmatively. This paper purports to reveal the tension between ETM and the prevailing anti-luck epistemology. Central to my argument is the fact that we often 'vaguely remember' a fact, of which one plausible interpretation is that our true memory-based beliefs formed in this way could easily have been false. Drawing on prominent theories of misremembering in philosophy of psychology (e.g. fuzzy-trace theory and simulationism), I will construct cases where the subject vaguely remembers that p while fails to meet the safety condition, which imply either that ETM is false or that safety is unnecessary for knowledge. The conclusion reached in this paper will be a conditional: if veritic epistemic luck is incompatible with knowledge, then 'remembering that p ' does not entail 'knowing that p '.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 Scots Philosophical Association and the University of St. Andrews.
      item: Philosophical Quarterly
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N