Open science is good science, so what's getting in the way?
The replication crisis in psychology has revealed that questionable research practices may have undermined the credibility of previously published research. This has led to meta-scientific efforts dedicated to improving research integrity and credibility by prioritizing transparency and reproducibil...
| Publicado en: | University of Toronto Medical Journal Vol. 99; no. 1; pp. 10 - 12 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
University of Toronto Medical Journal
Jan2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159462417&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 159462417 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 08332207 B8B7 jtl: University of Toronto Medical Journal issn: 08332207 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan2022 vid: 99 iid: 1 pid: 63529 pub: University of Toronto Medical Journal place: Toronto, Ontario artinfo: ui: 159462417 159462417 ppf: 10 ppct: 2 formats: tig: atl: Open science is good science, so what's getting in the way? aug: au: Cyran, Laura K. affil: Department of Psychology, St. John's University, 8000 Utopia Parkway, Queens, NY 11439 sug: subj: Science Psychology Research, Mental Health Communication Access to Information Open Access Publishing Scientists Decision Making Quality Improvement ab: The replication crisis in psychology has revealed that questionable research practices may have undermined the credibility of previously published research. This has led to meta-scientific efforts dedicated to improving research integrity and credibility by prioritizing transparency and reproducibility of research. This can be done through the use of open science practices, such as study preregistration, open data sharing, open source/code sharing, open-source publishing, and prioritizing replication studies. Many scientists agree that open science practices align with their scientific values, yet they are not currently standard practice. It is proposed that incentive structures that reduce the likelihood of adopting open science practices play a role in scientists' decision-making as they design, conduct, analyze, and disseminate results from their research. In order to improve the quality of the scientific record, systemic paradigm shift must occur at each step along the way. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|