Effect of a Wireless Vital Sign Monitoring System on the Rapid Response System in the General Ward.

While wireless vital sign monitoring is expected to reduce the vital sign measurement time (thus reducing the nursing workload), its impact on the rapid response system is unclear. This study compared the time from vital sign measurement to recording and rapid response system activation between wire...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Medical Systems Vol. 46; no. 10; pp. 1 - 7
Main Authors: Han, Won Ho, Sohn, Dae Kyung, Hwangbo, Yul, Park, Hee Jung, Kim, Mijung, Choi, Yoona, Shin, Il Won, Lee, Jung Min, Jeon, Heungki, Ryu, Ki Chung, Yoon, Taesik, Kim, Jee Hee
Format: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2022
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159499699&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 159499699
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01485598
        4N0
      jtl: Journal of Medical Systems
      issn: 01485598
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2022
      vid: 46
      iid: 10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        159499699
        159499699
        159499699
        10.1007/s10916-022-01846-8
        159499699
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Effect of a Wireless Vital Sign Monitoring System on the Rapid Response System in the General Ward.
      aug:
        au:
          Han, Won Ho
          Sohn, Dae Kyung
          Hwangbo, Yul
          Park, Hee Jung
          Kim, Mijung
          Choi, Yoona
          Shin, Il Won
          Lee, Jung Min
          Jeon, Heungki
          Ryu, Ki Chung
          Yoon, Taesik
          Kim, Jee Hee
        affil: Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Cancer Center, 10408, Goyang, South Korea
      sug:
        subj:
          Vital Signs
          Monitoring, Physiologic Methods
          Wireless Communications
          Rapid Response (Emergency Care)
          Hospital Units
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Funding Source
          Workload
          Inpatients
          Prospective Studies
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Chi Square Test
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          T-Tests
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Female
          Male
      ab: While wireless vital sign monitoring is expected to reduce the vital sign measurement time (thus reducing the nursing workload), its impact on the rapid response system is unclear. This study compared the time from vital sign measurement to recording and rapid response system activation between wireless and conventional vital sign monitoring in the general ward, to investigate the impact of wireless vital sign monitoring system on the rapid response system. The study divided 249 patients (age > 18 years; female: 47, male: 202) admitted to the general ward into non-wireless (n = 101) and wireless (n = 148) groups. Intervals from vital sign measurement to recording and from vital sign measurement to rapid response system activation were recorded. Effects of wireless system implementation for vital sign measurement on the nursing workload were surveyed in 30 nurses. The interval from vital sign measurement to recording was significantly shorter in the wireless group than in the non-wireless group (4.3 ± 2.9 vs. 44.7 ± 14.4 min, P < 0.001). The interval from vital sign measurement to rapid response system activation was also significantly lesser in the wireless group than in the non-wireless group (27.5 ± 12.9 vs. 41.8 ± 19.6 min, P = 0.029). The nursing workload related to vital sign measurement significantly decreased from 3 ± 0.87 to 2.4 ± 9.7 (P = 0.021) with wireless system implementation. Wireless vital sign monitoring significantly reduced the time to rapid response system activation by shortening the time required to measure the vital signs. It also significantly reduced the nursing workload.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N