Development of the 'AusPROM' recommendations for elective surgery patients.
Objective: Implementing the routine collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is key to improving healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. The implementation process can be strengthened through staff and patient co-design. The aim of this project was to develop a set of Australian...
| Publicado en: | Australian Health Review Vol. 46; no. 5; pp. 621 - 629 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
CSIRO Publishing
2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159536000&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 159536000 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01565788 HDW jtl: Australian Health Review issn: 01565788 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2022 vid: 46 iid: 5 pid: 1568 pub: CSIRO Publishing place: Canberra ACT, <Blank> artinfo: ui: 159536000 159536000 159536000 10.1071/AH22074 159536000 ppf: 621 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Development of the 'AusPROM' recommendations for elective surgery patients. aug: au: Brusco, Natasha K. Myles, Paul S. Atkinson, Victoria Woods, Jeffrey Hodge, Anita Jones, Cathy Lloyd, Damien Rovtar, Vincent Clifford, Amanda M. Wood, Tom Morris, Meg E. affil: Academic and Research Collaborative in Health (ARCH), La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic., Australia. sug: subj: Surgery, Elective Surgical Patients Patient-Reported Outcomes Outcome Assessment Methods Program Implementation Australia Human Funding Source Australia Delphi Technique Focus Groups Surveys Implementation Science ab: Objective: Implementing the routine collection of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) is key to improving healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. The implementation process can be strengthened through staff and patient co-design. The aim of this project was to develop a set of Australian PROM implementation recommendations ('AusPROM') to guide rapid translation into practice. Methods: Staff working across 29 Australian private hospitals participated in the project. The hospitals provided elective surgery and spanned each state and territory of Australia. Staff engaged in a Delphi technique to develop the AusPROM, which involved three iterative focus groups. To ensure full disclosure, staff were also provided with additional project-related data sources throughout the Delphi technique. This included data from a patient focus group (patient co-design), patient survey, technical feasibility testing, 3 months of pilot testing (four sites), 3 months of national implementation (29 sites) and global evidence. This process ensured that staff and patient feedback was used to co-design the three iterations of the AusPROM recommendations until the final agreed version was established. Results: A total of 22 AusPROM recommendations were included in the final iteration. The recommendations covered the domains of PROM characteristics, healthcare organisation characteristics, external influences, staff and patient characteristics, and facilitators to implementing AusPROMS in routine practice. Conclusion: The AusPROM recommendations offer practical considerations for the implementation of PROMs in hospitals. The iterative nature of the Delphi technique ensured that staff and patient co-design were central to the development of the AusPROM recommendations. What is known about the topic? Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are key to improving healthcare quality and patient satisfaction. What does this paper add? Practical considerations have been presented to support the implementation of PROMs in hospitals. What are the implications for practitioners? Knowing that the Australian PROM implementation recommendations (AusPROM) have been co-designed by hospital staff and patients, for hospital staff and patients, may help health services engage in PROM implementation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|