A Comparison between a remote testing and a laboratory test setting for evaluating emotional responses to non-speech sounds.
To evaluate remote testing as a tool for measuring emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Participants self-reported their hearing status and rated valence and arousal in response to non-speech sounds on an Internet crowdsourcing platform. These ratings were compared to data obtained in a laborat...
| Publicado en: | International Journal of Audiology Vol. 61; no. 10; pp. 799 - 809 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Oct2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159585210&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 159585210 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 14992027 JW2 jtl: International Journal of Audiology issn: 14992027 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 61 iid: 10 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 159585210 154032555 159585210 159585210 10.1080/14992027.2021.2007422 159585210 ppf: 799 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A Comparison between a remote testing and a laboratory test setting for evaluating emotional responses to non-speech sounds. aug: au: Picou, Erin M. Singh, Gurjit Russo, Frank A. affil: Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA sug: subj: Emotions Evaluation Audiometry, Speech Methods Hearing Disorders Funding Source Human Self Report Arousal Adult Middle Age Male Female Aged Academic Medical Centers Tennessee Confidence Intervals T-Tests Unpaired T-Tests Clinical Assessment Tools Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: To evaluate remote testing as a tool for measuring emotional responses to non-speech sounds. Participants self-reported their hearing status and rated valence and arousal in response to non-speech sounds on an Internet crowdsourcing platform. These ratings were compared to data obtained in a laboratory setting with participants who had confirmed normal or impaired hearing. Adults with normal and impaired hearing. In both settings, participants with hearing loss rated pleasant sounds as less pleasant than did their peers with normal hearing. The difference in valence ratings between groups was generally smaller when measured in the remote setting than in the laboratory setting. This difference was the result of participants with normal hearing rating sounds as less extreme (less pleasant, less unpleasant) in the remote setting than did their peers in the laboratory setting, whereas no such difference was noted for participants with hearing loss. Ratings of arousal were similar from participants with normal and impaired hearing; the similarity persisted in both settings. In both test settings, participants with hearing loss rated pleasant sounds as less pleasant than did their normal hearing counterparts. Future work is warranted to explain the ratings of participants with normal hearing. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|