Assessment of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation with look-locker T1 mapping and magnetic resonance elastography with histopathology as reference standard.

Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of T1 mapping and MR elastography (MRE) for staging of hepatic fibrosis and grading inflammation with histopathology as standard of reference. Methods: 68 patients with various liver diseases undergoing liver biopsy for suspected fibrosis or with an est...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 47; no. 11; pp. 3746 - 3758
Autores principales: von Ulmenstein, Sophie, Bogdanovic, Sanja, Honcharova-Biletska, Hanna, Blümel, Sena, Deibel, Ansgar R., Segna, Daniel, Jüngst, Christoph, Weber, Achim, Kuntzen, Thomas, Gubler, Christoph, Reiner, Cäcilia S.
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159662299&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 159662299
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2366004X
        JT14
      jtl: Abdominal Radiology
      issn: 2366004X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2022
      vid: 47
      iid: 11
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        159662299
        158768828
        10.1007/s00261-022-03647-6
        159662299
      ppf: 3746
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Assessment of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation with look-locker T1 mapping and magnetic resonance elastography with histopathology as reference standard.
      aug:
        au:
          von Ulmenstein, Sophie
          Bogdanovic, Sanja
          Honcharova-Biletska, Hanna
          Blümel, Sena
          Deibel, Ansgar R.
          Segna, Daniel
          Jüngst, Christoph
          Weber, Achim
          Kuntzen, Thomas
          Gubler, Christoph
          Reiner, Cäcilia S.
        affil: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
      sug:
      ab: Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of T1 mapping and MR elastography (MRE) for staging of hepatic fibrosis and grading inflammation with histopathology as standard of reference. Methods: 68 patients with various liver diseases undergoing liver biopsy for suspected fibrosis or with an established diagnosis of cirrhosis prospectively underwent look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping and MRE. T1 relaxation time and liver stiffness (LS) were measured by two readers. Hepatic fibrosis and inflammation were histopathologically staged according to a standardized fibrosis (F0–F4) and inflammation (A0–A2) score. For statistical analysis, independent t test, and Mann–Whitney U test and ROC analysis were performed, the latter to determine the performance of T1 mapping and MRE for fibrosis staging and inflammation grading, as compared to histopathology. Results: Histopathological analysis diagnosed 9 patients with F0 (13.2%), 21 with F1 (30.9%), 11 with F2 (16.2%), 10 with F3 (14.7%), and 17 with F4 (25.0%). Both T1 mapping and MRE showed significantly higher values for patients with significant fibrosis (F0-1 vs. F2-4; T1 mapping p < 0.0001, MRE p < 0.0001) as well as for patients with severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (F0-2 vs. F3-4; T1 mapping p < 0.0001, MRE p < 0.0001). T1 values and MRE LS were significantly higher in patients with inflammation (A0 vs. A1-2, both p = 0.01). T1 mapping showed a tendency toward lower diagnostic performance without statistical significance for significant fibrosis (F2-4) (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.91, p = 0.06) and with a significant difference compared to MRE for severe fibrosis (F3-4) (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.94, p = 0.03). For both T1 mapping and MRE, diagnostic performance for diagnosing hepatic inflammation (A1-2) was low (AUC 0.72 vs. 0.71, respectively). Conclusion: T1 mapping is able to diagnose hepatic fibrosis, however, with a tendency toward lower diagnostic performance compared to MRE and thus may be used as an alternative to MRE for diagnosing hepatic fibrosis, whenever MRE is not available or likely to fail due to intrinsic factors of the patient. Both T1 mapping and MRE are probably not sufficient as standalone methods to diagnose hepatic inflammation with relatively low diagnostic accuracy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N