Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.

* Context.--Breast carcinoma grade, as determined by the Nottingham Grading System (NGS), is an important criterion for determining prognosis. The NGS is based on 3 parameters: tubule formation (TF), nuclear pleomorphism (NP), and mitotic count (MC). The advent of digital pathology and artificial in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Vol. 146; no. 11; pp. 1369 - 1378
Autores principales: Mantrala, Siddhartha, Ginter, Paula S., Mitkari, Aditya, Joshi, Sripad, Prabhala, Harish, Ramachandra, Vikas, Kini, Lata, Idress, Romana, D'Alfonso, Timothy M., Fineberg, Susan, Jaffer, Shabnam, Sattar, Abida K., Chagpar, Anees B., Wilson, Parker, Singh, Kamaljeet, Harigopal, Malini, Koka, Dinesh
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: College of American Pathologists Nov2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159889122&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 159889122
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00039985
        1FS
      jtl: Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
      issn: 00039985
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2022
      vid: 146
      iid: 11
      pid: 2550
      pub: College of American Pathologists
      place: Northfield, Illinois
    artinfo:
      ui:
        159889122
        159889122
        159889122
        10.5858/arpa.2021-0299-OA
        159889122
      ppf: 1369
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
      aug:
        au:
          Mantrala, Siddhartha
          Ginter, Paula S.
          Mitkari, Aditya
          Joshi, Sripad
          Prabhala, Harish
          Ramachandra, Vikas
          Kini, Lata
          Idress, Romana
          D'Alfonso, Timothy M.
          Fineberg, Susan
          Jaffer, Shabnam
          Sattar, Abida K.
          Chagpar, Anees B.
          Wilson, Parker
          Singh, Kamaljeet
          Harigopal, Malini
          Koka, Dinesh
        affil: Onward Assist, Ojas Medtech Incubator, CIE, IIIT Hyderabad Campus, Gachibowli, Telangana, India
      sug:
        subj:
          Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Neoplasm Grading
          Artificial Intelligence
          Microscopy, Virtual
          Pathologists
          Human
          Female
          Cancer Patients
          Comparative Studies
          Multicenter Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Microscopy
          Algorithms
          Deep Learning
          Pathology, Clinical
          Female
      ab: * Context.--Breast carcinoma grade, as determined by the Nottingham Grading System (NGS), is an important criterion for determining prognosis. The NGS is based on 3 parameters: tubule formation (TF), nuclear pleomorphism (NP), and mitotic count (MC). The advent of digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) have increased interest in virtual microscopy using digital whole slide imaging (WSI) more broadly. Objective.--To compare concordance in breast carcinoma grading between AI and a multi-institutional group of breast pathologists using digital WSI. Design.--We have developed an automated NGS framework using deep learning. Six pathologists and AI independently reviewed a digitally scanned slide from 137 invasive carcinomas and assigned a grade based on scoring of the TF, NP, and MC. Results.--Interobserver agreement for the pathologists and AI for overall grade was moderate (κ = 0.471). Agreement was good (κ = 0.681), moderate (κ = 0.442), and fair (κ = 0.368) for grades 1, 3, and 2, respectively. Observer pair concordance for AI and individual pathologists ranged from fair to good (j = 0.313-0.606). Perfect agreement was observed in 25 cases (27.4%). Interobserver agreement for the individual components was best for TF (κ = 0.471 each) followed by NP (κ = 0.342) and was worst for MC (κ = 0.233). There were no observed differences in concordance amongst pathologists alone versus pathologists + AI. Conclusions.--Ours is the first study comparing concordance in breast carcinoma grading between a multi-institutional group of pathologists using virtual microscopy to a newly developed WSI AI methodology. Using explainable methods, AI demonstrated similar concordance to pathologists alone.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N