Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey.

Introduction: When handover is conducted at the patient's bedside, active patient participation can be encouraged, which may improve the safety and quality of care. There is a need for valid and reliable tools to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, to ensure the rising...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 2492 - 2503
Autores principales: Tobiano, Georgia, Marshall, Andrea P., Gardiner, Therese, Jenkinson, Kim, Shapiro, Margaret, Ireland, Michael
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=159936717&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 159936717
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2022
      vid: 25
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        159936717
        158194351
        159936717
        159936717
        10.1111/hex.13569
        159936717
      ppf: 2492
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey.
      aug:
        au:
          Tobiano, Georgia
          Marshall, Andrea P.
          Gardiner, Therese
          Jenkinson, Kim
          Shapiro, Margaret
          Ireland, Michael
        affil: Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast Health, Southport Queensland,, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Consumer Participation
          Hand Off (Patient Safety)
          Psychometrics
          Self Report Evaluation
          Patient Attitudes Evaluation
          Instrument Validation
          Instrument Construction
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Exploratory Research
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Funding Source
          Conceptual Framework
          Content Validity
          Nurse-Patient Relations
          Patient Centered Care
          Questionnaires
          Coefficient alpha
          Confidence Intervals
          Comparative Studies
          Validation Studies
          Construct Validity
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Factor Analysis
          Correlational Studies
          Tertiary Health Care
          Australia
          Inpatients
          Chi Square Test
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Relative Risk
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: When handover is conducted at the patient's bedside, active patient participation can be encouraged, which may improve the safety and quality of care. There is a need for valid and reliable tools to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, to ensure the rising number of implementation and improvement efforts are consistently and effectively evaluated. The aim of this study is to systematically develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of a self‐report survey to measure patients' perceptions of participation in bedside handover. Methods: In Phase 1, our team developed a conceptual framework and item pool (n = 130). In Phase 2, content validity was assessed with four health consumers, four nurses and four researchers. Next, 10 current hospital inpatients tested the survey for end‐user satisfaction. In Phase 3, 326 inpatients completed the survey, allowing exploratory factor analysis, reliability analyses and convergent/divergent validity analyses to occur. Results: Phase 1 and 2 resulted in a 42‐item survey. In Phase 3, 321 surveys were available for analysis. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a three‐factor solution, with 24 items, which matched our conceptual framework. The three factors were: 'Conditions for patient participation in bedside handover', 'Level of patient participation in bedside handover' and 'Evaluation of patient participation in bedside handover'. There was strong evidence for factor reliability and validity. Additionally, the correlation between factors was strong. Conclusion: This study furthers our conceptual understanding by showing that nurse facilitating behaviours are a strong precursor for patient participation and perceived handover outcomes, justifying the need for nursing training. A robust survey has been developed to measure patient perceptions of participation in bedside handover, which can effectively evaluate this approach to care. Engaging consumers and nurses as research team members was invaluable in ensuring that the survey is acceptable for end‐users. Patient or Public Contribution: A health consumer and nurse partnered as members of the research team from study inception to dissemination.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N