Decoloniality and Disruption of the Scientific Status Quo: Dissemination of Universal Theoretical Assumptions in International Research.
The challenges faced by science in the international communication process range from the choice of philosophical and epistemological assumptions used in scientific research to the choice of participants who comprise the sample of the studies produced. There is, in the hierarchy of scientific produc...
| Publicado en: | Review of General Psychology Vol. 26; no. 4; pp. 416 - 426 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | review Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Dec2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160094901&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 160094901 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10892680 1GZK jtl: Review of General Psychology issn: 10892680 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 26 iid: 4 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 160094901 160094901 160094901 10.1177/10892680211065169 160094901 ppf: 416 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: Decoloniality and Disruption of the Scientific Status Quo: Dissemination of Universal Theoretical Assumptions in International Research. aug: au: de França Sá, Ana Luiza Marsico, Giuseppina affil: Federal Institute of Brasília, Brazil/ 243373 Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil sug: subj: Diffusion of Innovation Research Concepts and Principles Implementation Science Conceptual Framework Health Policy History Education Time Psychology, Applied ab: The challenges faced by science in the international communication process range from the choice of philosophical and epistemological assumptions used in scientific research to the choice of participants who comprise the sample of the studies produced. There is, in the hierarchy of scientific production, Westernized trends of theoretical assumptions that predominate. The challenge of producing and communicating scientific knowledge is now guided by a review that geographically and philosophically shifts the Western prominent place. The purpose of this article is use a decolonial perspective to theoretically problematize scientific practice and the process of publishing its results. It criticizes the assembly line in which psychology ends, especially in the publication of results as a condition for the constitution of scientific communities. The scientific community can assist in the dissemination of a certain theory, but it can also constitute an obstacle to new ideas. It points to decoloniality as an alternative path as a possibility of breaking with the production-line logic of publications. By presenting the example of González Rey's theory of subjectivity, it advocates the history-education-time tripod as necessary elements to address contemporary crises studied by psychology. The article demonstrates the possibility of rupture with the market-related scientific status quo. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|