Networks in philosophy: Social networks and employment in academic philosophy.
In recent years, the "science of science" has combined computational methods with novel data sources to understand the dynamics of research communities. Many of the questions investigated by science of science are also relevant to academic philosophy. To what extent can the discipline be divided int...
| Publicado en: | Metaphilosophy Vol. 53; no. 5; pp. 653 - 685 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160116682&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 160116682 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00261068 9OM jtl: Metaphilosophy issn: 00261068 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 53 iid: 5 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 160116682 10.1111/meta.12591 ppf: 653 ppct: 32 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 6.5MB tig: atl: Networks in philosophy: Social networks and employment in academic philosophy. aug: au: Contreras Kallens, P. Hicks, Daniel J. Jennings, C. D. affil: Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, USA Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca New York,, USA Data Science Initiative, University of California, Davis, USA su: Academic employment Scientific community Labor market Social networks Prestige Sex discrimination sug: subj: Academic employment Scientific community Labor market Social networks Prestige Sex discrimination keyword: academic job market analytic‐continental divide gender bias network analysis prestige bias research communities ab: In recent years, the "science of science" has combined computational methods with novel data sources to understand the dynamics of research communities. Many of the questions investigated by science of science are also relevant to academic philosophy. To what extent can the discipline be divided into subfields with different methods and topics? How are prestige and credit distributed across the discipline? And how do these factors interact with other factors, such as gender, to shape job market outcomes? Using job market data for anglophone academic philosophy, this paper finds, first, evidence that is consistent with the analytic‐continental divide but is also consistent with other, more complex ways of organizing academic philosophy into distinct intellectual traditions; second, a clear prestige hierarchy, dividing Ph.D. programs into two distinct prestige categories; and, third, evidence that gender, prestige, and country have notable effects on academic job market outcomes for recent philosophy Ph.Ds. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Metaphilosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Metaphilosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|