Improved survival in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure undergoing catheter ablation compared to medical treatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Introduction: Increasing evidence has suggested improved outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing catheter ablation (CA) as compared to medical therapy. We sought to investigate the benefit of CA on outcomes of patients with AF and HF as compared to medical th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 33; no. 11; pp. 2356 - 2367
Autores principales: Romero, Jorge, Gabr, Mohamed, Alviz, Isabella, Briceno, David, Diaz, Juan Carlos, Rodriguez, Daniel, Patel, Kavisha, Polanco, Dalvert, Trivedi, Chintan, Mohanty, Sanghamitra, Della Rocca, Domenico, Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya, Natale, Andrea, Di Biase, Luigi
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160149544&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160149544
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2022
      vid: 33
      iid: 11
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160149544
        158414711
        160149544
        160149544
        10.1111/jce.15622
        160149544
      ppf: 2356
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Improved survival in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure undergoing catheter ablation compared to medical treatment: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials.
      aug:
        au:
          Romero, Jorge
          Gabr, Mohamed
          Alviz, Isabella
          Briceno, David
          Diaz, Juan Carlos
          Rodriguez, Daniel
          Patel, Kavisha
          Polanco, Dalvert
          Trivedi, Chintan
          Mohanty, Sanghamitra
          Della Rocca, Domenico
          Lakkireddy, Dhanunjaya
          Natale, Andrea
          Di Biase, Luigi
        affil: Department of Medicine, Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Montefiore‐Einstein Center for Heart and Vascular Care, Montefiore Medical Center, Division of Cardiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx New York,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Atrial Fibrillation Therapy
          Heart Failure Therapy
          Catheter Ablation
          Atrial Fibrillation Prognosis
          Heart Failure Prognosis
          Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Use
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          PubMed
          Embase
          Cochrane Library
          Mortality Risk Factors
          Arrhythmia, Atrial
          Recurrence
          Ventricular Ejection Fraction
          Cardiac Patients
          Male
          Female
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Descriptive Statistics
          Survival Analysis
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Introduction: Increasing evidence has suggested improved outcomes in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF) undergoing catheter ablation (CA) as compared to medical therapy. We sought to investigate the benefit of CA on outcomes of patients with AF and HF as compared to medical therapy. Methods and Results: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials was performed for clinical studies evaluating the benefit of CA for patients with AF and HF. Primary endpoint was all‐cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included atrial‐arrhythmia recurrence and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Eight randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 2121 patients (mean age: 65 ± 5 years; 72% male). Mean follow‐up duration was 32.9 ± 14.5 months. All‐cause mortality in patients who underwent CA was significantly lower than in the medical treatment group (8.8% vs. 13.5%, RR 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51−0.83, p =.0005). A 35% relative risk reduction and 4.7% absolute risk reduction in all‐cause mortality was observed with CA. Rates of all‐atrial arrhythmia recurrence were significantly lower in the CA group (39.9% vs. 69.6%, RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.40−0.76, p =.0003). Improvement in LVEF was significantly higher in patients undergoing CA (+9.4 ± 7.6%) as compared to conventional treatment (+3.3 ± 8%) (mean difference 6.2, 95% CI: 3.6−8.8, p <.00001). Conclusion: CA for AF in patients with HF decreases all‐cause mortality, improves all‐atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate and LVEF when compared to medical management. CA should be considered the treatment of choice to improve survival in this select group of patients. Nonetheless, the benefit of CA in patients with severely reduced ejection fraction and New York Heart Association class IV HF has not been clearly elucidated.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N