Telerehabilitation for physical disabilities and movement impairment: A service evaluation in South West England.

Rationale, Aims and Objectives: Telerehabilitation was used to ensure continued provision of care during the COVID‐19 pandemic, but there was a lack of guidance on how to use it safely and effectively for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment. In this service evaluation, we aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 28; no. 6; pp. 1084 - 1096
Autores principales: Buckingham, Sarah A., Sein, Kim, Anil, Krithika, Demain, Sara, Gunn, Hilary, Jones, Ray B., Kent, Bridie, Logan, Angela, Marsden, Jonathan, Playford, E D., Freeman, Jenny
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160177708&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160177708
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13561294
        EV1
      jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
      issn: 13561294
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2022
      vid: 28
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160177708
        156367845
        160177708
        160177708
        10.1111/jep.13689
        160177708
      ppf: 1084
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Telerehabilitation for physical disabilities and movement impairment: A service evaluation in South West England.
      aug:
        au:
          Buckingham, Sarah A.
          Sein, Kim
          Anil, Krithika
          Demain, Sara
          Gunn, Hilary
          Jones, Ray B.
          Kent, Bridie
          Logan, Angela
          Marsden, Jonathan
          Playford, E D.
          Freeman, Jenny
        affil: Peninsula Allied Health Centre, School of Health Professions, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Telerehabilitation
          Movement Disorders Rehabilitation
          Persons with Disabilities
          Patient Satisfaction
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Work Experiences
          Remote Consultation
          Quality of Health Care Evaluation
          Human
          England
          Thematic Analysis
          Patient-Reported Outcomes
          Implementation Science
          Purposive Sample
          Patient Safety
          Male
          Female
          Field Notes
          Audiorecording
          Videorecording
          COVID-19 Pandemic
          Male
          Female
      ab: Rationale, Aims and Objectives: Telerehabilitation was used to ensure continued provision of care during the COVID‐19 pandemic, but there was a lack of guidance on how to use it safely and effectively for people with physical disabilities and movement impairment. In this service evaluation, we aimed to collate information on practitioner and patient experiences, challenges and facilitators, and examples of best practice to inform the development of an online toolkit and training package. Methods: Guided discussions were carried out with 44 practitioners, 7 patients and 2 carers from five health and social care organisations in South West England, and analysed thematically. Results: Practitioners and patients had positive experiences of telerehabilitation and were optimistic about its future use. Recognized benefits for people with physical disabilities included greater flexibility, reduced travel and fatigue, having appointments in a familiar environment and ease of involving family members. Challenges encountered were: technological (usability issues, access to technology and digital skills); difficulties seeing or hearing patients; the lack of 'hands‐on' care; and safety concerns. Facilitators were supported by colleagues or digital champions, and family members or carers who could assist patients during their appointments. Key themes in best practice were: person‐centred and tailored care; clear and open communication and observation and preparation and planning. Practitioners shared tips for remote physical assessments; for example, making use of patient‐reported outcomes, and asking patients to wear bright and contrasting coloured clothing to make it easier to see movement. Conclusion: Telerehabilitation holds promise in health and social care, but it is necessary to share good practice to ensure it is safe, effective and accessible. We collated information and recommendations that informed the content of the Telerehab Toolkit (https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/research/telerehab), a practical resource for practitioners, patients and carers, with a focus on remote assessment and management of physical disabilities and movement impairment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N