Effects of non-adjacent letter repetition in the same-different matching task.
Effects of non-adjacent character repetition were investigated using the same-different matching task. We compared matching of strings of 5 consonants with matching of 5 symbols in order to distinguish letter-specific mechanisms from generic order encoding mechanisms. Character repetition was found...
| Publicado en: | Language, Cognition & Neuroscience Vol. 37; no. 10; pp. 1292 - 1303 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160350838&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 160350838 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 23273798 IQ6T jtl: Language, Cognition & Neuroscience issn: 23273798 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 37 iid: 10 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 160350838 156190162 160350838 160350838 10.1080/23273798.2022.2061022 160350838 ppf: 1292 ppct: 11 formats: tig: atl: Effects of non-adjacent letter repetition in the same-different matching task. aug: au: Mirault, Jonathan Massol, Stéphanie Grainger, Jonathan affil: Aix-Marseille University & Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, Marseille, France sug: subj: Task Performance and Analysis Reading Evaluation Consonants Emblems and Insignia Language Processing Evaluation Human Comparative Studies Male Female Adolescence Young Adult Adult Reaction Time Evaluation Experimental Studies Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Male Female ab: Effects of non-adjacent character repetition were investigated using the same-different matching task. We compared matching of strings of 5 consonants with matching of 5 symbols in order to distinguish letter-specific mechanisms from generic order encoding mechanisms. Character repetition was found to facilitate "same" responses to both types of stimuli, but crucially the interfering effect of repetition on "different" responses was only significant with letter strings. However, the latter effect only emerged in response times (as well as error rates) when the repetition occurred in the target string as opposed to the reference string. We conclude that inhibitory effects of letter repetition reflect the operation of a letter-specific order encoding mechanism, and that letter repetition in the target string has a greater influence than letter repetition in the reference string when making "different" responses in the same-different matching task. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|