Implementation and safety evaluation of autoverification for select low-risk, high-volume medications in the emergency department.

Purpose Use of autoverification has decreased in many emergency departments (EDs) with the expansion of emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists. Few studies have evaluated ways to prioritize verification of medications. Here we describe a process to design, implement, and measure the safety of autoverif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Vol. 79; no. 23; pp. 2150 - 2159
Autores principales: Bienvenida, Ana, Kroll, Christian, Ruhland, Dan, Steffenhagen, Aaron, Patterson, Brian W, Halfpap, Joseph
Formato: algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA 12/1/2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160376841&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160376841
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10792082
        1X3
      jtl: American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy
      issn: 10792082
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 12/1/2022
      vid: 79
      iid: 23
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160376841
        160376841
        160376841
        10.1093/ajhp/zxac241
        160376841
      ppf: 2150
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Implementation and safety evaluation of autoverification for select low-risk, high-volume medications in the emergency department.
      aug:
        au:
          Bienvenida, Ana
          Kroll, Christian
          Ruhland, Dan
          Steffenhagen, Aaron
          Patterson, Brian W
          Halfpap, Joseph
        affil: Department of Pharmacy, Legacy Emmanuel Medical Center , Portland, OR
      sug:
        subj:
          Medication Errors Prevention and Control
          Medication Review Methods
          Automation
          Patient Safety Evaluation
          Program Evaluation
          Pharmacists
          Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems
          Electronic Order Entry
          Quality Improvement
          Emergency Care
          Human
          Retrospective Design
          Record Review
          Descriptive Statistics
          Checklists
          Emergency Service
          Descriptive Research
          Medication Errors Risk Factors
          Risk Assessment
      ab: Purpose Use of autoverification has decreased in many emergency departments (EDs) with the expansion of emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists. Few studies have evaluated ways to prioritize verification of medications. Here we describe a process to design, implement, and measure the safety of autoverification of low-risk, high-volume medications. Summary A 3-month retrospective review of medications ordered and administered in the ED generated a list of medications to be considered for autoverification. Concurrently, a novel risk stratification tool was created to identify low-risk medications. Taking these together, medications that were high volume and low risk were considered potentially autoverified medications (PAMs). To evaluate the safety of PAMs, a retrospective review of the ED medication orders placed before implementation of autoverification was performed. A total of 7,433 medication orders were reviewed. Of these, 3,057 orders (41%) were identified as PAMs. EM pharmacists verified 2,982 (97.5%) of the orders without changes. Of the remaining 93 orders that were modified or discontinued and met autoverification criteria, only 2 (0.07%) were identified as potentially inappropriate for autoverification. Conclusion Low-risk, high-volume medications can be safely autoverified in the ED by using a systematic approach to order selection. Using these methods can provide large decreases in verification volume, close to 41%, without compromising patient safety.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        algorithm
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N