A systematic review and meta‐analytical synthesis of the relationship between work engagement and job satisfaction in nurses.
Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the mixed conclusions regarding work engagement and job satisfaction in the nursing research literature by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Design and Methods: This meta‐analytic review synthesized 15 independent studies published between 2007 an...
| Published in: | Perspectives in Psychiatric Care Vol. 58; no. 4; pp. 3062 - 3079 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct2022
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160402084&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 160402084 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00315990 22L jtl: Perspectives in Psychiatric Care issn: 00315990 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 58 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 160402084 156091736 160402084 160402084 10.1111/ppc.13068 160402084 ppf: 3062 ppct: 17 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A systematic review and meta‐analytical synthesis of the relationship between work engagement and job satisfaction in nurses. aug: au: Yildiz, Bora Yildiz, Tayfun affil: Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey sug: subj: Work Engagement Job Satisfaction Nurses Human Systematic Review Meta Analysis Nurse Attitudes Research, Nursing Descriptive Statistics Nursing Practice Checklists PubMed Data Analysis Software Power Analysis ab: Purpose: This study aimed to clarify the mixed conclusions regarding work engagement and job satisfaction in the nursing research literature by conducting a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Design and Methods: This meta‐analytic review synthesized 15 independent studies published between 2007 and 2021. Findings: An overall effect size of random‐effect model was calculated as r = 0.47 (k = 15, N = 3,818, 95% confidence interval [0.43;0.51]). Data collection method and presence of control variable, as significant moderators, accounted for 43.6% and 43.8%, respectively, of the effect size heterogeneity. Practice Implications: While the positive relationship between work engagement and job satisfaction was higher in studies using the face‐to‐face data collection method, it was lower in studies using the control variable in their research models. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|