Validity and reliability of the block method for measuring thoracic hyperkyphosis.

This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity of the block method as compared with the gold standard (Cobb's method). An additional aim was to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of expert and novice assessors using the block method. In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 62 pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy Theory & Practice Vol. 38; no. 13; pp. 3037 - 3045
Main Authors: Chokphukiao, Pakwipa, Wiyanad, Arpassanan, Suwannarat, Patcharawan, Amatachaya, Sugalya, Mato, Lugkana, Wattanapan, Pattra, Gaogasigam, Chitanongk, Thaweewannakij, Thiwabhorn
Format: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Dec2022
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160402907&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160402907
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09593985
        BCJ
      jtl: Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
      issn: 09593985
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2022
      vid: 38
      iid: 13
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160402907
        152336968
        160402907
        160402907
        10.1080/09593985.2021.1975335
        160402907
      ppf: 3037
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Validity and reliability of the block method for measuring thoracic hyperkyphosis.
      aug:
        au:
          Chokphukiao, Pakwipa
          Wiyanad, Arpassanan
          Suwannarat, Patcharawan
          Amatachaya, Sugalya
          Mato, Lugkana
          Wattanapan, Pattra
          Gaogasigam, Chitanongk
          Thaweewannakij, Thiwabhorn
        affil: School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
      sug:
        subj:
          Thoracic Vertebrae Radiography
          Thoracic Vertebrae Physiopathology
          Radiography, Thoracic Methods
          Kyphosis
          Concurrent Validity
          Human
          Thailand
          Female
          Male
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Stratified Random Sample
          Consent (Research)
          Convenience Sample
          Sample Size
          Intrarater Reliability
          Interrater Reliability
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Correlation Coefficient
          Descriptive Statistics
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Data Analysis Software
          Confidence Intervals
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity of the block method as compared with the gold standard (Cobb's method). An additional aim was to examine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of expert and novice assessors using the block method. In a cross-sectional study, we enrolled 62 participants with hyperkyphosis aged ≥10 years, with hyperkyphosis defined as one or more blocks. The participants were stratified by age (<60 years and ≥60 years). To determine concurrent validity, and kyphosis was assessed in all the participants using the block method and Cobb's method. Finally, 15 participants were included in a reliability study. To determine intra- and inter-rater reliability, each participant was assessed twice, 7 days apart, by one expert and one novice using the block method. The concurrent validity of the block method and gold standard method showed moderate correlation (rs = 0.53, P <.001). However, after stratifying the participants by age (<60 years and ≥60 years), there was small to moderate correlation (rs = 0.42, P =.006, and rs = 0.64, P =.002, respectively). The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the expert and novice assessors was excellent (ICC3,1 = 0.82–0.97, P <.001). The findings showed small correlation in those <60 and moderate correlation in those ≥60 years, and reported excellent reliability. The block method can be used by novices with strong reliability. This method is a practical technique for early screening hyperkyphosis in the elderly.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Unknown
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N