Literary Form and Ethical Content.

The paper offers a qualified endorsement of Terry Eagleton's striking claim that "a work's moral outlook . . . may be secreted as much in its form as its content". A number of points are raised in defence of the claim: an argument for the inseparability, under certain conditions, of form and content...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy Vol. 13; no. 62; pp. 245 - 264
Autor principal: Lamarque, Peter
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Paradigm Publishing Services Dec2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160474227&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 160474227
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0873626X
        1CM2
      jtl: Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy
      issn: 0873626X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2021
      vid: 13
      iid: 62
      pid: 35924
      pub: Paradigm Publishing Services
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160474227
        10.2478/disp-2021-0013
      ppf: 245
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 341KB
      tig:
        atl: Literary Form and Ethical Content.
      aug:
        au: Lamarque, Peter
        affil: University of York
      su:
        Literary form
        Eagleton, Terry, 1943-
        Vocabulary
        Emotions
        Ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Literary form
          Eagleton, Terry, 1943-
          Vocabulary
          Emotions
          Ethics
      keyword:
        expressed vs felt emotion
        form and content in literature
        moral content and literary interpretation
        opaque/transparent modes of reading
        Terry Eagleton
      ab: The paper offers a qualified endorsement of Terry Eagleton's striking claim that "a work's moral outlook . . . may be secreted as much in its form as its content". A number of points are raised in defence of the claim: an argument for the inseparability, under certain conditions, of form and content in a literary work; an idea of moral content, not as derived moral principle, but as inward-facing interpretation grounded in an ethical vocabulary; the possibility of internal and external perspectives on fictional characters; and an emphasis on emotions expressed in, rather than caused by, narrative. Three literary examples are explored, to show how vocabulary, syntax, implicature, and tone, contribute to the emergence of moral salience. A consequence drawn is that the ethical stance readers take to a scene or incident is partially shaped by the narrative modes of its presentation. The overall perspective of the paper is that of aesthetic autonomism: the view that the aesthetic value of a work of literature is distinct from, and not reducible to, any instrumental moral values (positive or negative) attributed to the work.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy is the property of Paradigm Publishing Services and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Disputatio: International Journal of Philosophy
      holder: Paradigm Publishing Services
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2021
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N