Fairness as comparative desert.

One prominent theory of fairness is John Broome's. This article identifies several problems with Broome's theory but defends Broome's claim that fairness requires the proportionate satisfaction of claims. This article also shows how Broome's conception of fairness is compatible with fairness as comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ratio Vol. 35; no. 4; pp. 321 - 333
Main Author: Wu, S. Deon
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160530655&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 160530655
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00340006
        D8S
      jtl: Ratio
      issn: 00340006
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2022
      vid: 35
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160530655
        10.1111/rati.12358
      ppf: 321
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 295KB
      tig:
        atl: Fairness as comparative desert.
      aug:
        au: Wu, S. Deon
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Reading, Reading, UK
      su:
        Deserts
        Satisfaction
        Fairness
        Justice
      sug:
        subj:
          Deserts
          Satisfaction
          Fairness
          Justice
      keyword:
        desert
        equality
        fairness
        justice
        lotteries
        rights
      ab: One prominent theory of fairness is John Broome's. This article identifies several problems with Broome's theory but defends Broome's claim that fairness requires the proportionate satisfaction of claims. This article also shows how Broome's conception of fairness is compatible with fairness as comparative desert.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Ratio is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Ratio
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N