Does screening or routine enquiry for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) meet criteria for a screening programme? A rapid evidence summary.
Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic events in childhood that can have impacts throughout life. It has been suggested that ACEs should be 'screened' for, or routinely enquired about, in childhood or adulthood. The aim of this work is to review evidence for this against the U...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Public Health Vol. 44; no. 4; pp. 810 - 823 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Oxford University Press / USA
Dec2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160531779&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 160531779 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17413842 1CA0 jtl: Journal of Public Health issn: 17413842 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 44 iid: 4 pid: 622 pub: Oxford University Press / USA artinfo: ui: 160531779 160531779 160531779 10.1093/pubmed/fdab238 160531779 ppf: 810 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Does screening or routine enquiry for adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) meet criteria for a screening programme? A rapid evidence summary. aug: au: Gentry, S V Paterson, B A affil: Public Health England East of England Centre, Fulbourn , Cambridge CB21 5XA, UK sug: subj: Adverse Childhood Experiences Health Screening In Infancy and Childhood Medical Practice, Evidence-Based Committees Program Evaluation Human United Kingdom Child Medline Psycinfo Systematic Review Descriptive Statistics Child: 6-12 years ab: Background Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are traumatic events in childhood that can have impacts throughout life. It has been suggested that ACEs should be 'screened' for, or routinely enquired about, in childhood or adulthood. The aim of this work is to review evidence for this against the United Kingdom National Screening Committee (UKNSC) programme criteria. Methods A rapid review of evidence on ACEs screening was conducted using the approach of the UKNSC. Results Good quality evidence was identified from meta-analyses for associations between ACEs and a wide range of adverse outcomes. There was no consistent evidence on the most suitable screening tool, setting of administration, and time or frequency of use. Routine enquiry among adults was feasible and acceptable to service users and professionals in various settings. A wide range of potentially effective interventions was identified. Limited evidence was available on the potential for screening or routine enquiry to reduce morbidity and mortality or possible harms of screening. Conclusions Based on the application of available evidence to UKNSC screening criteria, there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the implementation of a screening programme for ACEs. Further research is needed to determine whether routine enquiry can improve morbidity, mortality, health and wellbeing. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|