Practitioner and digitally delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in people not seeking alcohol treatment: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis.

Aim: To compare the effectiveness of practitioner versus digitally delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption. Design: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis comprising comprehensive search for randomised controlled trials, robust screening and selection meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 118; no. 1; pp. 17 - 30
Autores principales: Beyer, Fiona R., Kenny, Ryan P. W., Johnson, Eugenie, Caldwell, Deborah M., Garnett, Claire, Rice, Stephen, Simpson, Julija, Angus, Colin, Craig, Dawn, Hickman, Matt, Michie, Susan, Kaner, Eileen F. S.
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160570422&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160570422
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2023
      vid: 118
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160570422
        158377863
        160570422
        160570422
        10.1111/add.15999
        160570422
      ppf: 17
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Practitioner and digitally delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption in people not seeking alcohol treatment: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Beyer, Fiona R.
          Kenny, Ryan P. W.
          Johnson, Eugenie
          Caldwell, Deborah M.
          Garnett, Claire
          Rice, Stephen
          Simpson, Julija
          Angus, Colin
          Craig, Dawn
          Hickman, Matt
          Michie, Susan
          Kaner, Eileen F. S.
        affil: Evidence Synthesis Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, The Catalyst, 3 Science Square, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Alcohol Abuse Therapy
          Telemedicine
          Health Care Delivery Methods
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Drinking Behavior
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
      ab: Aim: To compare the effectiveness of practitioner versus digitally delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption. Design: Systematic review and network meta‐analysis comprising comprehensive search for randomised controlled trials, robust screening and selection methods and appraisal with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta‐analyses were conducted in Stata using random effects, frequentist models. The confidence in network meta‐analysis (CINeMA) tool was used to assess confidence in effect sizes. Setting: Online or community or health settings where the intervention was immediately accessible without referral. Participants: Non treatment‐seeking hazardous or harmful drinkers. Measurements Primary outcome was mean difference in alcohol consumption (g/wk); secondary outcome was number of single high intensity drinking episodes. Baseline consumption was analysed as a covariate. Findings Of 201 included trials (94 753 participants), 152 reported a consumption outcome that could be converted to grams/week; 104 reported number of single high intensity drinking episodes. At 1 and 6 months, practitioner delivered interventions reduced consumption more than digitally delivered interventions (1 month: −23 g/wk (95% CI, −43 to −2); 6 months: −14 g/wk [95% CI, −25 to −3]). At 12 months there was no evidence of difference between practitioner and digitally delivered interventions (−6 g/wk [95% CI, −24 to 12]). There was no evidence of a difference in single high intensity drinking episodes between practitioner and digitally delivered interventions at any time point. Effect sizes were small, but could impact across a population with relatively high prevalence of hazardous and harmful drinking. Heterogeneity was a concern. Some inconsistency was indicated at 1 and 6 months, but little evidence was apparent at 12 months. Conclusion: Practitioner delivered interventions for reducing hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption are more effective than digitally delivered interventions up to 6 months; at 12 months there is no evidence of a difference.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N