Are genetic counselors prepared to counsel active‐duty service members? A survey of genetic counselors' self‐efficacy, counseling techniques, and knowledge of military policy.

Given the expected rise in genomic sequencing projects within the US Military and the increased availability of genetic testing to the United States as a whole, current and prospective active‐duty service members (SMs) may undergo genetic counseling services in the civilian sector for pre‐test and p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Genetic Counseling Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 1363 - 1373
Autores principales: Kamen, Michael, Hellwig, Lydia D., Maloney, Kristin A., Scott, Jessica, Turner, Clesson, Dixon, Shannan
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160570630&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160570630
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10597700
        41A
      jtl: Journal of Genetic Counseling
      issn: 10597700
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2022
      vid: 31
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160570630
        158435028
        160570630
        160570630
        10.1002/jgc4.1611
        160570630
      ppf: 1363
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Are genetic counselors prepared to counsel active‐duty service members? A survey of genetic counselors' self‐efficacy, counseling techniques, and knowledge of military policy.
      aug:
        au:
          Kamen, Michael
          Hellwig, Lydia D.
          Maloney, Kristin A.
          Scott, Jessica
          Turner, Clesson
          Dixon, Shannan
        affil: Master's in Genetic Counseling Training Program, Baltimore Maryland,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Genetic Counselors
          Counseling Methods
          Active Duty Personnel
          Self-Efficacy
          Professional Knowledge
          Clinical Competence
          Support, Psychosocial
          Human Needs (Psychology)
          Human
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Data Analysis Software
          Qualitative Studies
          Thematic Analysis
          Quantitative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Uncertainty
          Patient Safety
          Psychological Well-Being
      ab: Given the expected rise in genomic sequencing projects within the US Military and the increased availability of genetic testing to the United States as a whole, current and prospective active‐duty service members (SMs) may undergo genetic counseling services in the civilian sector for pre‐test and post‐test counseling. The overall goal of this study was to better understand genetic counselors' preparedness to address military‐specific policies and psychosocial needs of patients from this underrepresented population. Members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors were asked to complete a four‐part survey including demographic information, Likert scale questions to separately rate self‐efficacy when working with civilians and SMs, case scenarios with multiple‐choice options and open‐ended responses to assess knowledge of military policy, and open‐ended questions regarding psychosocial scenarios related to military service. Eighty‐eight responses were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel for the qualitive thematic analysis and SPSS/RStudio for the quantitative data. While over 75% (n = 69/88, SD = 0.48) of surveyed genetic counselors scored 4 of 4 on knowledge of military policy and reported similarly high levels of self‐efficacy when working with SMs (mean = 26.77 out of 30, SD = 4.15) and the general population (mean = 27.99 out of 30, SD = 4.31), the qualitative data suggested an alternative perspective. Up to 57% (n = 50/88) of responses were scored as expressing low confidence concerning knowledge of military policy. One potential explanation for this uncertainty may be due to participants reporting that they never (69.32% (n = 61/88]) or are unsure if (12.50% (n = 11/88]) they received training related to providing counseling services to SMs. We suggest the establishment of educational initiatives for genetic counselors focusing on how to discuss genetic testing with SMs in relation to their health and safety, well‐being, and potential employment implications.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N