Perceived safety in community and service settings among young adults experiencing homelessness: Differences by sexual and gender identity.

Homelessness poses risks to the health and safety of young adults; particularly among sexual and gender minority (SGM) young adults. The current study sought to better understand service use and perceived safety in community and service settings among SGM and cisgender heterosexual (cis‐hetero) youn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Community Psychology Vol. 70; no. 3/4; pp. 340 - 352
Autores principales: DiGuiseppi, Graham, Semborski, Sara, Rhoades, Harmony, Goldbach, Jeremy, Henwood, Benjamin F.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Homelessness poses risks to the health and safety of young adults; particularly among sexual and gender minority (SGM) young adults. The current study sought to better understand service use and perceived safety in community and service settings among SGM and cisgender heterosexual (cis‐hetero) young adults experiencing homelessness. Data come from a mixed‐method, ecological momentary assessment study (n = 80; 43% sexual minority; 10% gender minority) in Los Angeles, California. Participants reported their current location (service vs. nonservice setting) and perceived safety. Multilevel modeling examined associations between identity, location, and perceived safety; qualitative interviews with 20 SGM participants added context to quantitative findings. Overall, service location was associated with greater perceived safety (β =.27, p <.001). Compared to cis‐hetero participants, cisgender sexual minorities (β = −.23, p =.03) and sexual and gender minorities (β = −.50, p =.002) reported lower perceived safety in service settings (vs. nonservice settings). Qualitative interviews revealed themes and subthemes detailing safe/unsafe spaces and interpersonal conflict in the community, and relationships with staff, peers, transphobia, and positive experiences in service settings. Highlights: Overall, service settings (vs. community settings) are associated with greater perceived safety.Sexual and gender minority youth feel less safe in service settings (vs. cis‐hetero youth).Sexual and gender minorities must balance self‐expression and personal safety in community settings.Staff/client relationships, transphobia and positive experiences impact safety in service settings.