Challenging the ability intuition: From personal to extended to distributed belief‐forming processes.

Much of what we know results from information sources on which we epistemically rely. This fact about epistemic reliance, however, stands in tension with a very powerful intuition governing knowledge, an intuition that Pritchard (e.g., 2010) has termed the "ability intuition," the idea that a believ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophical Issues Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 351 - 367
Main Author: Shieber, Joseph
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160783398&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 160783398
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15336077
        1731
      jtl: Philosophical Issues
      issn: 15336077
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2022
      vid: 32
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160783398
        10.1111/phis.12222
      ppf: 351
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 300KB
      tig:
        atl: Challenging the ability intuition: From personal to extended to distributed belief‐forming processes.
      aug:
        au: Shieber, Joseph
        affil: Lafayette College, Easton PA, , USA
      su:
        Distributed computing
        Causation (Philosophy)
        Social epistemology
        Intuition
        Information resources
      sug:
        subj:
          Distributed computing
          Causation (Philosophy)
          Social epistemology
          Intuition
          Information resources
      ab: Much of what we know results from information sources on which we epistemically rely. This fact about epistemic reliance, however, stands in tension with a very powerful intuition governing knowledge, an intuition that Pritchard (e.g., 2010) has termed the "ability intuition," the idea that a believer's "reliable cognitive faculties are the most salient part of the total set of causal factors that give rise to [their] believing the truth" (Vaesen, 2011, p. 518; compare Greco, 2003; 2009; 2010). In this paper I suggest that this tension may indeed be ineliminable. I proceed by canvassing some representative attempts to reconcile epistemic reliance and the ability intuition. In doing so, I suggest that all of these attempts founder on one or the other of two elements of what I've previously described (Shieber, 2013, 2015) as a "personalist presumption" in discussions of social epistemology: an excessive focus on (i) reliability filters within the persons who are the recipients of information or (ii) on reliable truth‐tracking and ‐conveying abilities in the persons who are the transmitters of information. In conclusion, I suggest how best to resolve the tension: by abandoning the ability intuition.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Issues is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Issues
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N