Galimybių prieiga kaip metapolitinė kategorija: M. Nussbaum teisingumo koncepcijos analizė.
Many critics of Martha Nussbaum claim that her account of the capabilities approach is a perfectionist theory that does not provide a unique standpoint to political justice and only complements Rawls' conception of primary goods. The purpose of this article is to show that the capabilities approach...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 102; pp. 90 - 105 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160804488&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 160804488 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2022 vid: 102 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 160804488 10.15388/Problemos.2022.102.7 ppf: 90 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.8MB tig: atl: Galimybių prieiga kaip metapolitinė kategorija: M. Nussbaum teisingumo koncepcijos analizė. aug: au: Čekavičius, Laisvūnas affil: Vilniaus universiteto Filologijos fakultetas su: Nussbaum, Martha Craven, 1947- Capabilities approach (Social sciences) Justice Perfectionism (Personality trait) Neutrality Autonomy (Psychology) Practical politics sug: subj: Nussbaum, Martha Craven, 1947- Capabilities approach (Social sciences) Justice Perfectionism (Personality trait) Neutrality Autonomy (Psychology) Practical politics keyword: capabilities approach justice primary goods Rawls galimybių prieiga Nussbaum pirminės gėrybės Rawlsas teisingumas ab: Many critics of Martha Nussbaum claim that her account of the capabilities approach is a perfectionist theory that does not provide a unique standpoint to political justice and only complements Rawls' conception of primary goods. The purpose of this article is to show that the capabilities approach differs from primary goods in a sense that the former is orientated towards the ends of a good life, while the latter towards the means. The author argues that the capabilities approach takes an intermediate position between neutrality and perfectionism, maintains a position of relative autonomy, and in turn it can be viewed as a unique metapolitical category, that is to say, a principle of politics capable of accommodating different political views. Nemažai Marthos Nussbaum kritikų mano, kad jos naudojama galimybių prieiga neteikia pagrindo originaliam požiūriui į politinį teisingumą. Tai esanti perfekcionistinė teorija, kuri tik papildo Rawlso pirminių gėrybių koncepciją. Šio straipsnio tikslas yra parodyti, kad Nussbaum galimybių prieiga skiriasi nuo pirminių gėrybių kategorijos, nes ji suformuluota atsižvelgiant į gero gyvenimo tikslus, o ne priemones. Straipsnyje grindžiama pozicija, kad galimybių prieigą galima laikyti atskira metapolitine kategorija (t. y. politikos principu, gebančiu apimti skirtingas politines vizijas), nes ji užima tarpinę poziciją tarp neutralumo ir perfekcionizmo bei palaiko santykinės autonomijos poziciją. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|