Directly Discriminatory Algorithms.

Discriminatory bias in algorithmic systems is widely documented. How should the law respond? A broad consensus suggests approaching the issue principally through the lens of indirect discrimination, focusing on algorithmic systems' impact. In this article, we set out to challenge this analysis, argu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 86; no. 1; pp. 144 - 176
Autores principales: Adams‐Prassl, Jeremias, Binns, Reuben, Kelly‐Lyth, Aislinn
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160813667&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 160813667
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2023
      vid: 86
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160813667
        10.1111/1468-2230.12759
      ppf: 144
      ppct: 32
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 348KB
      tig:
        atl: Directly Discriminatory Algorithms.
      aug:
        au:
          Adams‐Prassl, Jeremias
          Binns, Reuben
          Kelly‐Lyth, Aislinn
      su:
        Algorithms
        Bias (Law)
        Indirect discrimination
        Discrimination lawsuits
        Discrimination (Sociology)
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms
          Bias (Law)
          Indirect discrimination
          Discrimination lawsuits
          Discrimination (Sociology)
      ab: Discriminatory bias in algorithmic systems is widely documented. How should the law respond? A broad consensus suggests approaching the issue principally through the lens of indirect discrimination, focusing on algorithmic systems' impact. In this article, we set out to challenge this analysis, arguing that while indirect discrimination law has an important role to play, a narrow focus on this regime in the context of machine learning algorithms is both normatively undesirable and legally flawed. We illustrate how certain forms of algorithmic bias in frequently deployed algorithms might constitute direct discrimination, and explore the ramifications—both in practical terms, and the broader challenges automated decision‐making systems pose to the conceptual apparatus of anti‐discrimination law.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N