The Bare Past.

In this paper, I first introduce one of the most prominent objections against the Growing Block Theory of time (GBT), the so-called 'epistemic objection', according to which GBT provides no way of knowing that our time is the objective present and, therefore, leads at best to absolute skepticism abo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophia Vol. 50; no. 5; pp. 2523 - 2551
Autor principal: Grandjean, Vincent
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160893821&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 160893821
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00483893
        1VPF
      jtl: Philosophia
      issn: 00483893
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2022
      vid: 50
      iid: 5
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160893821
        10.1007/s11406-022-00534-8
      ppf: 2523
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 844KB
      tig:
        atl: The Bare Past.
      aug:
        au: Grandjean, Vincent
        affil: Faculty of Philosophy, Radcliffe Humanities, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, OX2 6GG, Oxford, UK
      su:
        Skepticism
        Agnosticism
        Essentialism (Philosophy)
        Substance (Philosophy)
        Epistemic logic
      sug:
        subj:
          Skepticism
          Agnosticism
          Essentialism (Philosophy)
          Substance (Philosophy)
          Epistemic logic
      keyword:
        Bare particulars
        Epistemic objection
        Essentialism
        Existence in the past
        Growing Block Theory
        Natural kind
      ab: In this paper, I first introduce one of the most prominent objections against the Growing Block Theory of time (GBT), the so-called 'epistemic objection', according to which GBT provides no way of knowing that our time is the objective present and, therefore, leads at best to absolute skepticism about our temporal location, at worst to the quasi-certainty that we are located in the objective past. Secondly, I express my dissatisfaction regarding the various traditional attempts to address this objection, especially Merricks (2006), Forrest (2004) and Correia and Rosenkranz (2018). Thirdly, I show that the passage of time leads to an anti-essentialist picture of natural kinds. Finally, I develop my own solution to the epistemic objection, based on the continued existence of bare particulars.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Philosophia is a copyright of Springer, 2022. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Philosophia
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N