TOWARD THE RECOGNITION OF ARTIFICIAL HISTORY MAKERS.
Artificial intelligence is a historical discipline. This does not simply mean that its history can be written. It is historical on account of its recursive basis for action: its systems turn to prior beliefs—often through multiple steps or layers—to make recommendations for the present or prediction...
| Publicado en: | History & Theory Vol. 61; no. 4; pp. 107 - 119 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Dec2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160964689&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 160964689 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00182656 HAT jtl: History & Theory issn: 00182656 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 61 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 160964689 10.1111/hith.12278 ppf: 107 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 142KB tig: atl: TOWARD THE RECOGNITION OF ARTIFICIAL HISTORY MAKERS. aug: au: HUGHES‐WARRINGTON, MARNIE affil: University of South Australia and The Australian National University su: History Artificial intelligence Historians Metaphysics Aristotelianism (Philosophy) Turing, Alan Mathison, 1912-1954 sug: subj: History Artificial intelligence Historians Metaphysics Aristotelianism (Philosophy) Turing, Alan Mathison, 1912-1954 keyword: Alan Turing Aristotle artificial agents artificial intelligence logic of history metaphysics recommendation systems ab: Artificial intelligence is a historical discipline. This does not simply mean that its history can be written. It is historical on account of its recursive basis for action: its systems turn to prior beliefs—often through multiple steps or layers—to make recommendations for the present or predictions for the future. Using the two rooms approach of Alan Turing's imitation game, I highlight the potential for machine and human histories to be recognized via at least the idea of weak artificial intelligence. This recognition illuminates the mixed nature of the logic of history, combining deductions and endoxa. Finally, I note that illuminating and exploring this mixed logic of history signals a turn to historiographical metaphysics with Aristotelian features and, thus, the recognition of histories by professional historians as only part of a historiographical world. This signals that the recognition of machine and human history makers does not simply turn on the acknowledgement of imitation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of History & Theory is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: History & Theory holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|