Process and position power: a social relational research agenda about state power in negotiations.
Relational approaches bear a distinct added value for the study of the EU and international negotiations. In this research note we advocate for the combination of social network analysis with practice theory to better capture social relational forms of state power. We introduce the concepts of posit...
| Publicado en: | Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 29; no. 12; pp. 1994 - 2007 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160967128&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 160967128 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13501763 5BM jtl: Journal of European Public Policy issn: 13501763 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 29 iid: 12 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 160967128 10.1080/13501763.2022.2135755 ppf: 1994 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: Process and position power: a social relational research agenda about state power in negotiations. aug: au: Lovato, Marianna Maurer, Heidi affil: School of Politics and International Relations, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland Department for E-Governance and Administration, University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems), Krems an der Donau, Austria su: Social status State power Computer performance Negotiation Social network analysis Electoral coalitions Social networks sug: subj: Social status State power Computer performance Negotiation Social network analysis Electoral coalitions Social networks ab: Relational approaches bear a distinct added value for the study of the EU and international negotiations. In this research note we advocate for the combination of social network analysis with practice theory to better capture social relational forms of state power. We introduce the concepts of position and process power to develop an analytical framework that conceptualizes negotiations as dynamic interactions between the two. We contend that negotiation outcomes rest on a country's ability to shape subsequent network configurations based on its initial network position and its competent performance of practices. Among other things, our framework offers a nuanced understanding of the formation and role of coalition groupings as well as the forms of social relational power that can emerge among states. As we argue, states can both 'be' (due to exogenous and pre-existing factors) and 'become' powerful (thanks to the social dynamics unique to each negotiation). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|