Complementary and Alternative Medicine Online Learning Intervention for Oncology Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Introduction: With the increased usage of complementary approaches in oncology comes the need for its integration into healthcare professional (HCP) education. The purpose of this single-arm, mixed-methods study was to examine the feasibility and benefits of a brief complementary and alternative med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Integrative Cancer Therapies Vol. 21; pp. 1 - 14
Autores principales: Baydoun, Mohamad, Levin, Gregory, Balneaves, Lynda G., Oberoi, Devesh, Sidhu, Aven, Carlson, Linda E.
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Jan-Dec2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=161033908&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 161033908
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15347354
        P69
      jtl: Integrative Cancer Therapies
      issn: 15347354
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan-Dec2022
      vid: 21
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        161033908
        161033908
        161033908
        10.1177/15347354221079280
        161033908
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 13
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Complementary and Alternative Medicine Online Learning Intervention for Oncology Healthcare Providers: A Mixed-Methods Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Baydoun, Mohamad
          Levin, Gregory
          Balneaves, Lynda G.
          Oberoi, Devesh
          Sidhu, Aven
          Carlson, Linda E.
        affil: University of Regina, Regina, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Alternative Therapies Methods
          Education, Non-Traditional
          Internet Utilization
          Learning Methods
          Oncologists Education
          Attitude to Health Evaluation
          Needs Assessment
          Human
          Canada
          Multimethod Studies
          Pilot Studies
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Qualitative Studies
          Oncologic Care
          Cancer Patients
          Health Personnel Education
          Descriptive Statistics
          Comparative Studies
          Funding Source
      ab: Introduction: With the increased usage of complementary approaches in oncology comes the need for its integration into healthcare professional (HCP) education. The purpose of this single-arm, mixed-methods study was to examine the feasibility and benefits of a brief complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) learning intervention for improving HCP knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CAM use in cancer care, and explore the experiences of participating HCPs. Methods: HCPs from the Tom Baker Cancer Centre in Alberta, Canada, were invited to participate in 3 online interactive learning modules that reviewed: (1) basic CAM information, (2) HCP-patient CAM communication, and (3) evidence-based CAM decision support. The study survey consisted of attitude (n = 14), knowledge (n = 31), and practice (n = 31) items, administered at baseline and two-months post-intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a subset of participants. Results: Approximately 300 HCPs were invited to participate, of which 105 expressed interest in the study (35%), and 83 of them consented to participate (79%). The intervention completion rate was 73% (61/83 HCPs). There was a significant pre-post change in HCPs' attitudes and, to a lesser extent, knowledge and practices related to CAM (8/14 attitude items changed pre-post compared to 13/31 knowledge items and 5/31 practice items), in which more HCPs reported patients should be assisted in making complementary therapy (CT) decisions, exhibited greater knowledge about CAM, and more often engaged in a CAM-related clinical practice. Qualitative findings supported the beneficial effects of the modules, with HCPs describing themselves as being more likely to ask patients about their CAM use and referring them to credible CAM resources. Nonetheless, the majority did not feel adequately prepared to make recommendations about specific CTs, even after the intervention. Conclusion: The current study suggests that online CAM learning offers a feasible and potentially promising intervention for improving oncology HCP knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding CAM, warranting further investigation. This study highlights a need for institutional resources to help HCPs fully integrate CT decision support into cancer patient care. A coordinated evidence-based CAM program at cancer centers may help ensure that all patients' CAM-related needs are properly attended to.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N