HLUBOKÝ NESOUHLAS A NATURALIZOVANÁ ETIKA.
Disagreement over moral issues is not uncommon and usually is not considered an obstacle in the search for the right solutions. Differences among individuals' moral beliefs can be explained by the application of different non-moral facts, i.e., by different epistemology. Some ethicists believe that...
| Publicado en: | Filozofia Vol. 77; no. 10; pp. 756 - 770 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Filozofia
2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161052952&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 161052952 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0046385X 1VQE jtl: Filozofia issn: 0046385X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2022 vid: 77 iid: 10 pid: 55711 pub: Filozofia artinfo: ui: 161052952 10.31577/filozofia.2022.77.10.2 ppf: 756 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.8MB tig: atl: HLUBOKÝ NESOUHLAS A NATURALIZOVANÁ ETIKA. aug: au: CHUDÁRKOVÁ, PETRA affil: Univerzita Hradec Králové, Filozofická fakulta, Katedra filozofie a společenských věd, Hradec Králové, ČR Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Filozofická fakulta, Katedra filozofie, Olomouc, ČR su: Ethical problems Normativity (Ethics) Individual differences Optimism Theory of knowledge sug: subj: Ethical problems Normativity (Ethics) Individual differences Optimism Theory of knowledge keyword: Applied ethics Deep disagreement Justification Moral intuitions Naturalized ethics Normative ethics Reflective thinking Applied ethics Deep disagreement Justification Moral intuitions Naturalized ethics Normative ethics Reflective thinking ab: Disagreement over moral issues is not uncommon and usually is not considered an obstacle in the search for the right solutions. Differences among individuals' moral beliefs can be explained by the application of different non-moral facts, i.e., by different epistemology. Some ethicists believe that such a problem is not for ethics to solve. This paper aims to show that this conviction is mistaken, as moral and epistemological aspects present two sides of the same coin. Although on the moral level, one might be optimistic and hope for finding an agreement with peers based on relevant argumentation, on the epistemological level, such optimism is impossible. The main reason is deep disagreement, which occurs sooner or later when solving controversial moral dilemmas. The paper tries to explain how certain types of deep disagreement might be normatively solved within the framework of naturalized ethics. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Czech refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Filozofia is the property of Filozofia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Filozofia holder: Filozofia dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|