Zhuangzi on Yu, Zhou, and the ontic indeterminacy of the Dao.

The definitions of yu 宇 and zhou 宙 in the "Gengsang Chu 庚桑楚" chapter of the Zhuangzi have been cited as the earliest definitions of space and time in the Chinese philosophical tradition. However, careful analysis of chosen modern translations reveals that the definitions entail rather obscure relati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the History of Philosophy Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 127 - 137
Autor principal: Lin, Qiu
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jan2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The definitions of yu 宇 and zhou 宙 in the "Gengsang Chu 庚桑楚" chapter of the Zhuangzi have been cited as the earliest definitions of space and time in the Chinese philosophical tradition. However, careful analysis of chosen modern translations reveals that the definitions entail rather obscure relationships between the Dao and space and time. I argue that the obscurity is not inherent in the text, but arises from the practice of rendering yu and zhou as the conceptual counterparts of space and time or related concepts. Instead, I propose that we leave the terms untranslated. This practice would not only forestall interpretive difficulties concerning the Dao's relations to space and time, but it would also preserve the Zhuangzist yu and zhou as two distinctive, ontic notions that indicate the Dao's indeterminate modes of existence, a unique feature of the Zhuangzi.