Transfer effects from language processing to visual attention dynamics: The impact of orthographic transparency.
The consistency between letters and sounds varies across languages. These differences have been proposed to be associated with different reading mechanisms (lexical vs. phonological), processing grain sizes (coarse vs. fine) and attentional windows (whole words vs. individual letters). This study ai...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Psychology Vol. 114; no. 1; pp. 86 - 112 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Feb2023
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=161180770&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 161180770 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00071269 BJP jtl: British Journal of Psychology issn: 00071269 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2023 vid: 114 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 161180770 10.1111/bjop.12598 ppf: 86 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: C – @attributes: type: P size: 948KB tig: atl: Transfer effects from language processing to visual attention dynamics: The impact of orthographic transparency. aug: au: Iniesta, Antonio Bajo, María Teresa Rivera, Marta Paolieri, Daniela affil: Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain su: Multilingualism Phonetics Phonological awareness sug: subj: Multilingualism Phonetics Phonological awareness keyword: bilingualism lexical local attention phonological transparency writing bilingualism lexical local attention phonological transparency writing ab: The consistency between letters and sounds varies across languages. These differences have been proposed to be associated with different reading mechanisms (lexical vs. phonological), processing grain sizes (coarse vs. fine) and attentional windows (whole words vs. individual letters). This study aimed to extend this idea to writing to dictation. For that purpose, we evaluated whether the use of different types of processing has a differential impact on local windowing attention: phonological (local) processing in a transparent language (Spanish) and lexical (global) processing of an opaque language (English). Spanish and English monolinguals (Experiment 1) and Spanish–English bilinguals (Experiment 2) performed a writing to dictation task followed by a global–local task. The first key performance showed a critical dissociation between languages: the response times (RTs) from the Spanish writing to dictation task was modulated by word length, whereas the RTs from the English writing to dictation task was modulated by word frequency and age of acquisition, as evidence that language transparency biases processing towards phonological or lexical strategies. In addition, after a Spanish task, participants more efficiently processed local information, which resulted in both the benefit of global congruent information and the reduced cost of incongruent global information. Additionally, the results showed that bilinguals adapt their attentional processing depending on the orthographic transparency. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|